[Marxism] World proletarianisation/Help Mr. Jurrian.

Julio Huato juliohuato at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 27 14:20:51 MST 2004

Michael Perelman wrote:

>I debated Borlaug at Santa Barbara about 30 years ago -- I am fuzzy on the 
>date, but he had received his Nobel prize recently.  He could not attend in 
>person because of some problem, so he participated by phone.

I'd have loved to watch that debate.

>Neither of us were impressed with the other.

Call me a sucker, but I'm impressed with both of you.

>I had been thinking more about the Green Revolution in India at the time, 
>but I was under the impression that the GR in Mexico was closely associated 
>with scarce water being given to richer landowners.

Land and water distribution are obviously decisive in any practical 
application of technology in agriculture.  But neither of them was under the 
control of Borlaug et alia.

That said, in the 1940s and 1950s land ownership (and water control) was the 
least concentrated ever in Mexico's history.  It was right after the great 
land distributions under the Agrarian Reform launched by Lázaro Cárdenas in 
the late 1930s.  At the time Mexico was a predominantly rural society, and 
land distribution and wealth distribution overlapped a lot.  So if there was 
a point in 20th century Mexico's history where a technological revolution 
was poised to benefit more people, it was precisely then.  Poor producers 
couldn't reap more benefits because of the political economy of import 
substitution, the industrialization strategy in effect between the mid 1950s 
and the early 1980s.

>Anyway, I gave my critique of the GR in Farming for Profit in a Hungry 

Out of print.  You send me a copy and I'll send you a check.


MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latino.msn.com/autos/

More information about the Marxism mailing list