[Marxism] Occupation forces losing control

Mike Friedman mikedf at mail.amnh.org
Tue Nov 30 22:23:26 MST 2004

Don't discount a marriage of convenience between an incoming Shia 
government and Washington, and subsequent detente between Washington and 
Iran, or at least a follow-up to overtures by "moderate" Shia sectors in 
Iran. If a Shia administration in Iraq is accepted by Bush, the pending 
Iran conflict will almost certainly go on the back burner. And if it isn't, 


At 06:04 PM 11/30/2004, you wrote:
>Message: 5
>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:34:36 -0500
>From: Louis Proyect <lnp3 at panix.com>
>Subject: Re: [Marxism] Occupation forces losing control
>To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition
>         <marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu>
>Message-ID: <41ACCB4C.1050207 at panix.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>srobin21 at comcast.net wrote:
> > But note that later in the same article, Patrick Cockburn states his 
> opinion that the Shia population seems to be losing sympathy or patience 
> with the Sunni resistance, in comparison with the attitude of support 
> that was commonly reported during the April events of this year- 
> evidently many of the casualties to the resistance seem to be Shia.  If 
> this is the case, then the resistance may be increasingly contained 
> within the so-called Sunni Triangle. Steve
>This point is well-taken. However, the other side of this is a
>potentially much sharper fight down the road when the USA is forced to
>deal with a Shiite government that comes to power through US-sponsored
>elections. I can't imagine Washington allowing a second Iran in the
>Mideast. It is practically declaring war on the first.

More information about the Marxism mailing list