[Marxism] Another Syriana review

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Thu Nov 24 11:42:47 MST 2005

(Exactly the same criticisms as mine.)

The Best Intentions


[from the December 12, 2005 issue]

I want America to watch a serious movie about guns and oil, spooks and 
money, geopolitics and fractured family life, in all their Tolstoyan 
interconnectedness. What I need, though, is for George Clooney to joke 
manfully about having the world's coolest toys. I want a thriller where the 
establishing shots ("Beirut. Hezbollah Headquarters") set up instructive 
scenes showing how the poor and dispossessed struggle in the Middle East, 
the wealthy enjoy their high life in Geneva, the powerful scheme for more 
power in Washington. What I need, though, is for Matt Damon to zoom through 
a crazy car chase, followed by sex with a startling woman. I want ambition 
and substance and contemporaneity and big ideas, and I want them released 
nationwide. What I need is for Jeffrey Wright to act everybody else off the 

I want--or am supposed to want--the big and very serious new movie with 
Clooney, Damon and Wright. But sometime during the second hour of watching 
CIA operative Clooney, bearded and plump, schlep around like Zero Mostel 
doing baggy-suit tragedy; sometime while seeing Damon behave no more 
colorfully than would his character, a market analyst, and witnessing 
Wright's unrelieved confinement in the role of a corporation attorney--the 
kind of guy who would iron his underpants, after starching them--my 
personal cravings fell into conflict with the good of the electorate. I 
wanted Three Kings, The Bourne Identity, Angels in America, no matter how 
much the American people might need Stephen Gaghan's Syriana.

Does an informed citizenry require this picture? Maybe. Television and 
radio do a poor job of analyzing the relationships among oil companies, 
lawyers, financiers, governments (at overt and covert levels) and the 
world's Muslim population (whether militant or just hanging on). In fact, 
television and radio generally welcome such analysis as they would a tax 
audit from a hepatitis carrier. They prefer such unpleasantness to be 
handled by The Nation, a publication that goes unread by 99.93 percent of 
Americans. So all honor to Gaghan, his producers and Warner Bros. for 
taking on the job. If Gaghan (best known for the screenplay of Steven 
Soderbergh's Traffic) has overreached, then he's failed the right way, 
through an excess of virtue. Syriana's flaws, presumably, would come from 
his faults as a first-time director.

Maybe. Inexperience might account for the stuttering rhythms of Syriana 
(new scenes keep breaking in before the old ones really get started), or 
the frequent use of images as mere accompaniments to dialogue, or the lapse 
of having Matt Damon and his movie wife, Amanda Peet, attend a funeral 
looking like the world's best-rested mourners. Nonlethal errors, you might 
say, even though they blow across the screen with the monotony of a 
sandstorm. The bigger problem--for which inexperience cannot be an 
excuse--lies with the script itself.

Gaghan has focused the screenplay on characters who work as midlevel 
functionaries: the aging covert operations guy who's too professional for 
his own good, the young market analyst who blunders his way into serving a 
Persian Gulf prince, the lawyer who's assigned to search for illegalities 
in a huge corporate merger. In the course of Syriana, all of these men get 
squeezed by people with more power and a greater stake in the game--a 
premise that helps to structure the film and has the added merit of being 
plausible. Yet the contrasting ways in which these characters respond to 
pressure turn out to be irrelevant. Their choices have large personal 
consequences--destroying an individual career here, advancing one 
there--but they cannot affect the great oiled machine that Gaghan has 
constructed as his cinematic world. It rolls over everyone without so much 
as a cough in the carburetor.

This is neither realism nor tragedy. It's cynicism, which exposes itself 
most nakedly in Damon's addresses to the Arab characters, and in Gaghan's 
own portrayal of them.

Damon first. In speeches that pointedly dispense with all courtesy, his 
character castigates the Persian Gulf princes for arrogance, incompetence, 
addiction to luxury and indifference to work. Damon bellows these charges 
straight into the camera--and in the movies, energy doesn't lie. He's 
thrilling the crowd (a presumably non-Islamic audience) by telling off the 
Arab elite on their behalf. Although Gaghan, in a gesture toward fairness, 
has invented one good Arab prince (Alexander Siddig), whose principles are 
so wholesome that Sesame Street could teach them, I think he expects most 
viewers to recognize Damon's angry tune and to hum along with it.

When Gaghan turns from the elite to Islam's masses, he uses no mouthpiece. 
Instead, he directly sums up untold millions in the character of a 
Pakistani guest worker (Mazhar Munir), who follows a predictable route from 
the unemployment line to a terrorist-spawning Islamic school. Like the 
other characters, he is mere fuel for Gaghan's world-machine; but unlike 
them, he isn't given even the illusion of choice. His course is set from 
the moment he comes on screen--which makes nonsense of the pretty talk of 
democracy that you hear from Damon and his prince.

In this way, Syriana spreads before you a grand political vista, only to 
deny the possibility of political agency. In the film's terms, the sole 
effective sphere of action is the family--and, more specifically, the 
father-son relationship. This, too, is a structural element of the 
screenplay, which sets up contrasts among all the characters. But just as 
Syriana misses the fun of a good thriller, so too does it fall short as 
family drama.

Put it this way: At the end of War and Peace, Tolstoy filled the father's 
hand with a soaking diaper. In Syriana, unfortunately, we don't get that 
much juice. 

More information about the Marxism mailing list