[Marxism] Re Peak Oil
jonflanders at jflan.net
Sat Oct 15 17:52:31 MDT 2005
Interesting points being made about nuclear power.
I would point out however, that even if nukes prove safe and viable,
this does very little to solve the transportation problem, which is 95%
dependent on petroleum.
Given the problems that GM is currently having, how about this for a
Nationalize General Motors and begin a crash program building electric
vehicles, most importantly light rail, trolleys etc.
This would be only fair, since GM conspired with Firestone and Standard
Oil to destroy our electric light rail trolley system fifty years ago.
checking on the Cuba oil history......get back later on that.
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 19:35 -0400, Les Schaffer wrote:
> Rod Holt wrote:
> > Dear comrades:
> > Thorium is cheap, abundant, and it has a million advantages.
> i take it you haven't read the IAEA report on thorium fuel cycle i
> forwarded last week? they make a long list of challenges to Th cycle,
> what do you make of them?
> and where are you getting your numbers from, you make it sound like you
> are just making them up. and what about the rest of the planet's
> population, those without existing stocks of uranium and plutonium. will
> the Bush admin be handing out nuclear wastes toIndia and China and Iran
> and Iraq and .. and ... and ... so they can convert their abundant Th to
> U to keep themselves warm too?
> in the meantime, you also need to clip unquoted text, please and thank you.
> les schaffer
> YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu
> Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
More information about the Marxism