[Marxism] Supreme Court Decision on Guantanamo

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Jul 12 11:55:44 MDT 2006

Mike F. wrote:
>However, I agree with Walter that it can be just as important to point out
>and sharpen divisions within the ruling class as it is to point out the
>commonality of interests for the rulers. These tactical divisions
>shouldn't be confused with differences in strategic vision (such as there
>is one on the part of the rulers or their political representatives).

Getting back to the kinds of questions that Yoshie posed yesterday, would a 
socialist parliamentarian state that he or she took no position on the 
Hamdan case in the period leading up to the Supreme Court decision? I think 
that would be a mistake. It is a step forward for the Supreme Court to rule 
that the Geneva Conventions apply to Guantanamo. If there had been a 
unanimous decision on behalf of the government case, the possibility of 
freeing these men, as the Militant windbags call for, would have become 
more remote.



More information about the Marxism mailing list