[Marxism] On Dubai deal, Democrats try to get ahead of GOP right on Arab-hatred

Fred Feldman ffeldman at bellatlantic.net
Wed Mar 1 00:54:21 MST 2006

February 28, 2006

Once You've Sanctioned Torture, Anything Else is Possible

Racism Thrives


Those who worry that the world's Arab and Muslim populations pose a
threat to free speech in Western democracies need not fear. The first
Amendment remains intact-particularly, it seems, when it comes to the
"right" to inflict racial slurs. Indeed, the last few weeks have
witnessed a spate of pundits and politicians exercising their right to
freely engage in racist demagoguery against Arabs and Muslims without

Celebrity hatemonger Ann Coulter did not disappoint the rabid crowd at
the annual gathering of the Conservative Political Action Conference
(CPAC) in Washington, D.C. last month. The highlight of Coulter's
address, sandwiched between speeches by Dick Cheney, Senate Majority
Leader Bill Frist and Newt Gingrich, was, "I think our motto should be
post-9-11, 'raghead talks tough, raghead faces consequences.'"
Journalist Max Blumenthal remarked, "This declaration prompted a
boisterous ovation" from the overflow crowd.

Fifteen minutes later, Blumenthal asked Frist his opinion on the
"raghead" characterization. Frist responded, "I wasn't there so I better
not comment." No major newspaper reported on Coulter's racial epithet to
the more than 1,000 Republican Party stalwarts.

The "raghead" comment is consistent with an article Coulter posted on
her website, which reads in part, "Jihad monkey talks tough; jihad
monkey takes the consequences. Sorry, I realize that's offensive. How
about 'camel jockey'? What? Now what'd I say? Boy, you tent merchants
sure are touchy."

Last week, the level of xenophobia surged on Capitol Hill when Democrats
Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer, along with Frist and House Speaker
Dennis Hastert, whipped themselves into a (bipartisan)
frenzy to block Dubai Ports World from replacing a British company in
running six U.S. ports.

As the Washington Post reported, "The lawmakers said they feared that
national security might be compromised by letting a Middle Eastern firm
manage key U.S. ports."

Raising the level of melodrama, Clinton argued that the port management
deal would "turn over our sovereignty to another country." New York
Republican congressman Vito Fossella compared the port deal to an
"announcement that Dubai was to take over security at our airports."

Schumer told reporters, "How can we turn over one of the most vital
areas in our nation to a country with a significant nexus of involvement
with terrorists?"

Although Schumer argued in a February 22 USA Today op-ed piece that
Congressional opposition "has nothing to do with the fact that the
United Arab Emirates...is an Arab nation," the Democrats' media attack
dogs were already cut loose.

That same day, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd called for
"corporate racial profiling," quoting Jan Gadiel of 9/11 Families for a
Secure America: "Our borders are wide open. We don't know who's in our
country right now, not a clue. And now they're giving away our ports."

Even Dowd admitted that election-year politics played a role in the
Congressional mutiny. "Lawmakers, many up for re-election, have learned
well from Karl Rove. Playing the terror card works."

Wall Street Journal columnist Dan Henninger argued, "It gave the
Democrats an opportunity to get to the right of the president on a
terror issue, and attack him for being soft on terror."

It is now acceptable-indeed, commonplace-to racially stereotype and
denigrate Arabs and Muslims. And there is no outcry against the
curtailment of their civil liberties and rights.

A December 2004 Cornell University opinion poll showed 44 percent of
Americans approved curtailing some civil liberties for all Muslim
Americans-including registering with the federal government, close
monitoring of mosques by law enforcement agencies and racially profiling
citizens of Muslim or Middle Eastern heritage.

Interestingly, a recent Gallup World Poll of predominantly Islamic
countries showed that overwhelming majorities said they favored the
right to freedom of speech in their own countries.

As journalist Robert C. Koehler remarked, " Maybe we should be careful
about making common cause with born-again free speech advocates who
never showed any tolerance for it until it became a handy club for
bashing Muslims." He added, in the current atmosphere, "It's OK to
torture them because they've already been dehumanized en masse. Anything
could follow."

Sharon Smith's new book is Women
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1931859116/counterpunchmaga> and
Socialism. She can be reached at: sharon at internationalsocialist.org

More information about the Marxism mailing list