[Marxism] Surplus-value model of class

Austin, Andrew austina at uwgb.edu
Thu Mar 16 07:23:43 MST 2006


Such reductionism is inconsistent with historical materialist conceptions of productive modalities.  I am still waiting to see proponents of this model generate a viable class analytic.  Hell, I prefer Wright's approach over Resnick-Wolff.  Andrew

________________________________

From: marxism-bounces at lists.econ.utah.edu on behalf of clintonf at optusnet.com.au
Sent: Wed 3/15/2006 11:34 PM
To: marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: [Marxism] Surplus-value model of class



Very interesting. This sounds like the "surplus value" model of class favoured by Resnick and Wolff of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

http://www.umass.edu/resnick-wolff/

CF


<Subject: Re: [Marxism] What kind of socialism are we talking about here?
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3 at panix.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:38:40 -0500

What is of
interest to socialists is how oil or copper profits are used, not that the
state owns the mines, wells, etc.
>


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism




More information about the Marxism mailing list