[Marxism] Notes on David Brion Davis' review
bhandari at berkeley.edu
Sat Nov 4 10:28:46 MST 2006
I didn't make clear that the bottom half of my post was an excerpt
from Slavery and the origins of racism by Lance Selfa International
Socialist Review Issue 26, November-December 2002. There you'll find
full referrences. Here you will find references to Fields and others.
I accept Verlinden's and Blackburn's thesis that the New World
plantations are best understood as continuations of the sugar
colonies in the Eastern Mediterranean financed by Italian merchant
capital, not of the colonization of the Irish (or of the Islamic
slave trade) .
Was a proto racist doctrine and the white race invented in the course
of the brutal colonization of the Irish? Yes my definitions don't
allow me to see that in the historical record Allen has recovered
with care and detail.
For that reason I can't see racism in classical antiquity either.
Even the right of inheritances implied in the idea of noble blood
lines seems not to me to have been a proto racist concept; what was
passed on putatively in the blood, how it was passed it on, which
parent passed on what, what effect it had on development were simply
confounding questions (again I recommend Matthew Cobb's very exciting
new book Generation). What was justified by bloodline was the rights
of conquest, divine placement in an elevated place in the Great Chain
of Being, lineage with of one of Noah's favored sons or with Abel,
noble acculturation. All in my estimation not racist conceptions. Or
if we consider them as such, then the modern genetic determinist
point of view which racism is the historically most important example
loses all specificity.
I consider Anglo American racial hereditary bondage to have been in
its twilight the birthplace of the first proto genetic
preformationist ideology, though the end of slavery was most
ironically the midwife of this racism! And this ideology has done, is
doing and will be doing as much harm as any other. Not all of it
racist. So I don't think my focus in anachronistic. Needless to say,
I am heavily indebted to Stephen Rose, Richard Lewontin and Jonathan
I know that my definition does not allow me accept many of the newer
definitions of racism, Balibar's for example. And I think we may be
both interested in talking about that.
Thanks for the reply.
I mostly agree with what you say. weren't the irish sent to the
caribbean during cromwellian conquest slaves, basically? allen also
discusses the scottish salt miners, also enslaved.
one might try to save the "essential differences" thesis by arguing
that they were not white. but this is just epicycles.
I do have one question for you: allen's main point in volume one for
the social construction of "race,' thus the invention of the white
race, is closely tied to his arguments around what he calls the
"irish mirror." and the point of this analysis is to take the
parallel between white supremacy, thus anti black racism in
continental plantation colonies, and "religio-racial oppression" in
Ireland very seriously. on surface, you would then have a
disagreement with allen, since presumably you would not want to
extend the term "racism" to the irish case.
at any rate, I think most of the differences between you and allen or
you and me are terminological. still, allen wants to define racism
primarily as a relation of subordination--racial oppression, whatever
various peoples might think of each other-- whereas you seem to lean
more on the specific ideological--pseudoscientific--mechanism of
More information about the Marxism