[Marxism] Marx's _Capital_
shamresearch at yahoo.co.nz
Thu Aug 2 03:20:38 MDT 2007
I beg to differ with you there Ricardo. Like his interlocutor Geras, Wheen is one of that gaggle of faux-scholars and media pundits who have been trying to turn Marx into a defender of late capitalist globalisation and of wars against Muslim obscurantists on the benighted peripheries of capitalism in Afghanistan and Iraq. I wrote a bit about these blokes and the tradition they come from at:
Wheen's silly talk about Capital as a Gothic novel and so on is a way of avoiding any discussion of the book's dialectical structure - what Luxembourg called its 'Rococo ornamentation' - and logic. Wheen wants to present Marx as a conventional bourgeois political economist with a social consience and a slightly eccentric prose style.
Wheen's latest book is a collection of the articles Marx wrote for the International Herald Tribune in the early 1850s. It's significant that he should edit stuff from a period when Marx had a relatively sanguine attitude towards capitalist modernisation and imperialism, and even on occasion celebrated the depredations of British imperialism in India. For the likes of Wheen, Geras, and Christopher Hitchens - who gave the book a rave review - there's a clear parrallel between the 'objectively progressive' imperialism of the early Victorian era and the 'wars for the Enlightenment' being fought by the US and UK today. Approach with caution.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
More information about the Marxism