[Marxism] Thecriticismofreligion[was:RE:Vnzla:reasonstobeoptimistic]

Mark Lause MLause at cinci.rr.com
Tue Aug 28 13:46:46 MDT 2007

Owen Davies (or Daniel) wrote that the Democratic Party "does seem quite
loose.  More of a loose alliance which in the past has probably been a
strength but could prove to be an Achilles Heel in the future."

I don't understand the last part of this, but it isn't a loose alliance.
You aren't connected to it by degrees.  Unless you're a contributor, you
either vote for it or you don't.  It's a take-it-or-leave-it proposition.
Nothing loose about it.....

In reply to my comment that you can call "the Republican Party or the
Catholic Church or the Norwood Chess Club" a popular front just as easily as
you can call the Democratic Party one, Owen Davies (or Daniel) wrotes "you
could say it about those other institutions but I wouldn't."

This seems to me to be the problem, you have no reason why you would in one
case and not in the others.  It's all arbitrary.


More information about the Marxism mailing list