[Marxism] British health care system is sicko

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Fri Oct 19 12:25:07 MDT 2007


http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1019/p04s01-woeu.html

British healthcare in crisis despite massive investment
A report from the Healthcare Commission says that patients at many 
health facilities face long waits and uneven quality.
By Mark Rice-Oxley | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

London

On the eve of his election victory in 1997, Tony Blair famously declared 
that Britain had 24 hours to save its derelict National Health Service.

So it is acutely awkward for his successor, Gordon Brown, that, 10 years 
on, his government is scrambling to fend off accusations of crisis in 
the NHS following a damning report about hospital infections that 
critics say is symptomatic of a wider malaise in British healthcare.

Health Secretary Alan Johnson was forced to apologize in Parliament this 
week after it emerged that at least 90 patients in southeast England 
died as a result of infections picked up in the hospital.

The Healthcare Commission, a national watchdog, blamed safety lapses and 
overcrowding. It painted a bleak picture of teeming wards where 
overworked nurses didn't even help patients to the bathroom.

Government officials have sought to portray the crisis at hospitals in 
the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells district as a one-off. But opposition 
members of Parliament and health-service experts say the cost and 
staffing pressures affecting the trust are widespread, and that many 
other "primary care trusts" that manage local health services are 
struggling.

"The problem is not just Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells," says John 
Lister of the Health Emergency pressure group. "The outbreak ... exposed 
a weakness that exists in trusts up and down the country, given the way 
they are forced to run."

Dr. Lister says government-imposed targets have instilled a commercial 
culture, resulting in "perverse" imperatives like cost-control and 
"productivity" driving decisionmaking in hospitals. "It's the burger-bar 
style of efficiency – the more you can do with fewer staff the better," 
he says. "But patient safety seems to come at the bottom of the list.... 
The Hippocratic oath has gone out of the window."

Labour has made much of its bid to "rescue" the NHS. It has presided 
over a kind of permanent revolution, recruiting tens of thousands of 
doctors and nurses (many from overseas, leading to charges of inadequate 
domestic training), building hospitals with the private sector, 
revamping hospital funding, and encouraging competition. It has also 
spent money: The NHS bill is to rise from £35 billion in 1998 to £110 
billion (about $224 billion) by 2011.

But critics say the extra billions have not always been well spent. A 
recent survey said Britain ranks 17th out of 29 European countries on a 
range of healthcare benchmarks, including quality of service, length of 
wait times, and patient information.

"We are surprised that given the massive spend on healthcare, Britain is 
not faring better," says Kasja Wilhelmsson, director of European affairs 
at the Health Consumer Powerhouse, a Brussels-based healthcare research 
group that conducted the survey. "For waiting times, they are pretty 
close to the worst in Europe. And outcomes [of treatment] is not high 
either.

"More money isn't the solution. You need to restructure and think in 
different ways," she adds.

Six million-plus Britons now have some form of private health coverage, 
though access to private specialists is controlled by overtaxed NHS 
general practitioners (GPs).

Surveys and comments indicate that morale at NHS – with 1.4 million 
staff, the third-largest employer in the world – is low. Doctors are 
furious at new recruitment and promotion rules. GPs are nervous about 
plans to open surgeries on weekends. Nurses rail against low pay.

This week, a survey of GPs found 1 in 6 wanted to leave. The Nurse of 
the Year, Justine Whitaker, said she was quitting the NHS.

""Every time something new is introduced," she told BBC radio, "that 
means more time at my desk and less time with my hands on a patient."




More information about the Marxism mailing list