[Marxism] Another view of "It's a wonderful life"
ffeldman at bellatlantic.net
Sun Dec 21 22:26:35 MST 2008
Well, in his articles on the SWP which are actually quite good and
recommended, Walter took the name of It's a Wonderful Life. Perhaps like his
"unfaithful servant", to use the title of one of my favorite songs by The
Band, I actually try to see it every few years at least. It never ceases to
But it has always struck me as a dark image of life in the United States.
Bailey's continual frustration, his constantly giving up his hopes and
aspirations, seems more like the opening of the trend that leads to the
recent Revolutionary Road.
Louis is a good reviewer and I am not. Also unlike him, I was a premature
auteurist and follower of Andrew Sarris, even though I did not discover any
of this until the 1970s under the tutelage of an SWP comrade at the time,
Dave Saperstan. I was deep into noir and hard-boiled westerns from the age
of about 9. I eventually found out that strings of movies I loved were
products of people like Sam Fuller, Howard Hawks, Don Siegel, Phil Karlson.
And, of course, each in a class by themselves, John Ford and Orson Welles.
At any rate, here is a review of "Its a Wonderful Life" from a recent New
York Times that comes closer to seeing how I saw and see it.
December 19, 2008
Wonderful? Sorry, George, Its a Pitiful, Dreadful Life
By WENDELL JAMIESON
MR. ELLMAN didnt tell us why he wanted us to stay after school that
December afternoon in 1981. When we got to the classroom cinderblock
walls, like all the others, with a dreary view of the parking lot we
He had set up a 16-millimeter projector and a movie screen, and rearranged
the chairs. Book bags, jackets and overcoats were tossed on seat backs,
teenagers sat, suspicious, slumping, and Mr. Ellman started the projector
whirring. Its a Wonderful Life filled the screen.
I was not a mushy kid. My ears were fed a steady stream of the Clash and the
Jam, and I was doing my best to conjure a dyed-haired, wry, angry-young-man
teenage persona. But I was enthralled that afternoon in Brooklyn. In the
years that followed, my affection for Its a Wonderful Life has never
waned, despite the films overexposure and sugar-sweet marketing, and the
rolling eyes of friends and family.
Lots of people love this movie of course. But Im convinced its for the
wrong reasons. Because to me Its a Wonderful Life is anything but a
cheery holiday tale. Sitting in that dark public high school classroom, I
shuddered as the projector whirred and George Baileys life unspooled.
Was this what adulthood promised?
Its a Wonderful Life is a terrifying, asphyxiating story about growing up
and relinquishing your dreams, of seeing your father driven to the grave
before his time, of living among bitter, small-minded people. It is a story
of being trapped, of compromising, of watching others move ahead and away,
of becoming so filled with rage that you verbally abuse your children, their
teacher and your oppressively perfect wife. It is also a nightmare account
of an endless home renovation.
I havent seen it on a movie screen since that first time, but on Friday it
begins its annual pre-Christmas run at the IFC Cinema in Greenwich Village.
I plan to take my 9-year-old son and my father, who has never seen it the
whole way through because he thinks its too corny.
How wrong he is.
Im no movie critic, and Ill leave to others any erudite evaluation of the
film as cinematic art, but to examine it closely is to experience Its a
Wonderful Life on several different levels.
Many are pulling the movie out of the archives lately because of its
prescience on the perils of trusting bankers. Ive found, after repeated
viewings, that the film turns upside down and inside out, and some glaring
and often funny flaws become apparent. These flaws have somehow deepened
my affection for it over the years.
Take the extended sequence in which George Bailey (James Stewart), having
repeatedly tried and failed to escape Bedford Falls, N.Y., sees what it
would be like had he never been born. The bucolic small town is replaced by
a smoky, nightclub-filled, boogie-woogie-driven haven for showgirls and
gamblers, who spill raucously out into the crowded sidewalks on Christmas
Eve. Its been renamed Pottersville, after the villainous Mr. Potter, Lionel
Barrymores scheming financier.
Heres the thing about Pottersville that struck me when I was 15: It looks
like much more fun than stultifying Bedford Falls the women are hot, the
music swings, and the fun times go on all night. If anything, Pottersville
captures just the type of excitement George had long been seeking.
And what about that banking issue? When he returns to the real Bedford
Falls, George is saved by his friends, who open their wallets to cover an
$8,000 shortfall at his savings and loan brought about when the evil Mr.
Potter snatched a deposit mislaid by Georges idiot uncle, Billy (Thomas
But isnt George still liable for the missing funds, even if he has made
restitution? I mean, if someone robs a bank, and then gives the money back,
that person still robbed the bank, right?
I checked my theory with Frank J. Clark, the district attorney for Erie
County upstate, where, as far as I can tell, the fictional Bedford Falls is
set. He thought it over, and then agreed: George would still face
prosecution and possible prison time.
In terms of the theft, sure, you take the money and put it back, you still
committed the larceny, he said. By giving the money back, you have
mitigated in large measure what the sentence might be, but you are still
technically guilty of the offense.
He took this a bit further: If you steal over $3,000, its a D felony; 2 ½
to 7 years is the maximum term for that. The least you can get is probation.
You know Jimmy Stewart, though, he had that hangdog face. Hed be a tough
guy to send to jail.
He paused, and then added: You really have a cynical sense of humor.
He should have met me when I was 15.
The movie starts sappily enough, with three angels in outer space discussing
Georges fate. Maybe thats what turned my dad off, that or the saccharine
title. Im amazed they didnt spoil it for me in 1981, but I may not have
been paying attention yet.
Soon enough, though, the darkness sets in. Georges brother, Harry (Todd
Karns), almost drowns in a childhood accident; Mr. Gower, a pharmacist,
nearly poisons a sick child; and then George, a head taller than everyone
else, becomes the pathetic older sibling creepily hanging around Harrys
high school graduation party. That night George humiliates his future wife,
Mary (Donna Reed), by forcing her to hide behind a bush naked, and the
evening ends with his fathers sudden death.
Disappointments pile up. George cant go to college because of his
obligation to run the Bailey Building and Loan, and instead sends Harry. But
Harry returns a slick, self-obsessed jerk, cannily getting out of his
responsibility to help with the family business, by marrying a woman whose
dad gives him a job. George again treats Mary cruelly, this time by chewing
her out and bringing her to tears before kissing her. It is hard to
understand precisely what she sees in him.
George is further emasculated when his bad hearing keeps him out of World
War II, and then its Christmas Eve 1945. These scenes rather than the
subsequent Bizarro-world alternate reality have always been the films
defining moments for me. All the decades of anger boil to the surface.
After Potter takes the deposit, George flies into a rage and finally lets
Uncle Billy know what he thinks of him, calling him a silly, stupid old
fool. Then he explodes at his family.
If you watch the film this year, keep a close eye on Stewart during this
sequence. First he smashes a model bridge he has built. Then, like any
parent who loses his temper with his children, he seems genuinely
embarrassed. Hes ashamed. He apologizes. And then ... slowly ... he starts
getting angry all over again.
To me Stewarts rage, building throughout the film, is perfectly calibrated
and believable here.
Now as for that famous alternate-reality sequence: This is supposedly what
the town would turn out to be if not for George. I interpret it instead as
showing the true characters of these individuals, their venal internal
selves stripped bare. The flirty Violet (played by a supersexy Gloria
Grahame, who would soon become a timeless film noir femme fatale) is a dime
dancer and maybe a prostitute; Ernie the cabbies blank face speaks true
misery as George enters his taxi; Bert the cop is a trigger-happy madman,
violating every rule in the patrol guide when he opens fire on the fleeing,
yet unarmed, George, forcing revelers to cower on the pavement.
Gary Kamiya, in a funny story on Salon.com in 2001, rightly pointed out how
much fun Pottersville appears to be, and how awful and dull Bedford Falls
is. He even noticed that the only entertainment in the real town, glimpsed
on the marquee of the movie theater after George emerges from the alternate
universe, is The Bells of St. Marys.
Now thats scary.
Ill do Mr. Kamiya one better, though. Not only is Pottersville cooler and
more fun than Bedford Falls, it also would have had a much, much stronger
future. Think about it: In one scene George helps bring manufacturing to
Bedford Falls. But since the era of Its a Wonderful Life manufacturing in
upstate New York has suffered terribly.
On the other hand, Pottersville, with its nightclubs and gambling halls,
would almost certainly be in much better financial shape today. It might
well be thriving.
I checked my theory with the oft-quoted Mitchell L. Moss, a professor of
urban policy at New York University, and he agreed, pointing out that, of
all the upstate counties, the only one that has seen growth in recent years
has been Saratoga.
The reason is that it is a resort, and it has built an economy around
that, he said. Meanwhile the great industrial cities have declined
terrifically. Look at Connecticut: where is the growth? Its in casinos;
they are constantly expanding.
In New York, Mr. Moss added, Gov. David A. Paterson is under enormous
pressure to allow gambling upstate because of the economic problems.
We ease up on our lot of cultural behaviors in a depression, he said.
What a grim thought: Had George Bailey never been born, the people in his
town might very well be better off today.
Not too long ago I friended Mr. Ellman on Facebook. (To call him by his
given name, Robert, is somehow still unnatural to me.)
I asked him about inviting us to stay after school to eat popcorn and watch
Its a Wonderful Life. He said it was always one of his favorite films, if
a little corny and sentimental, and that he always saw staying late with us
as part of his job. If anything, he said, there was just as much to learn
after school as there was during it.
He reminded me that it was an actual film print we saw; this was before
video took hold. And he also proved to be a close viewer. It was Mr. Ellman
who pointed out to me how cruel George is to Mary the night they first kiss,
and who told me to keep an eye out for Ernies vacant stare when George gets
into the cab. He said he cried the first time he saw it.
I asked him if hed continued those December viewings.
In later years, he wrote, it became too difficult to get students to
stay. We started doing a festival of student-written/student-directed
one-act plays right after the end of the fall show. Everyone was too busy to
stay and watch a movie.
Its a shame.
So Ill tell Mr. Ellman a secret. Its something I felt while watching the
film all those years ago, but was too embarrassed to reveal.
That last scene, when Harry comes back from the war and says, To my big
brother, George, the richest man in town? Well, as I sat in that classroom,
despite the dreary view of the parking lot; despite the moronic Uncle Billy;
despite the too-perfect wife, Mary; and all of Georges lost opportunities,
I felt a tingling chill around my neck and behind my ears. Fifteen years old
and imagining myself an angry young man, I got all choked up.
And I still do.
"Its a Wonderful Life continues through Tuesday at the IFC Center, 323
Avenue of the Americas, at West Third Street, Greenwich Village; (212)
More information about the Marxism