[Marxism] 'Tenured radical' tries to revive professors group
mikedf at amnh.org
Thu Jul 17 14:02:23 MDT 2008
>From: Mark Lause <markalause at gmail.com>
>Sent: Jul 17, 2008 3:09 PM
>To: gdunkel at mindspring.com
>Subject: Re: [Marxism] 'Tenured radical' tries to revive professors group
>I've been an AAUP member for years. Local chapters can take adjuncts
>and visiting faculty into the bargaining unit, which is the case here.
> However, that doesn't mean that they are going to have the same
>benefits. The best we've fought for is an improvement, which we've
>gotten. It matters a lot to those at the bottom, but it's a pittance
>financially and in every other sense.
> professoriate. In a field defined by petty considerations of turf,
> rivalries, and personal jealousies, resolution of the structural
> problem and the need for "solidarity" are not even acknowledged.
This sounds about right. It's absolutely feudal. In CUNY schools, status
and duties (such as observations) put tenured faculty on the side of
Moreover, the problems adjuncts face aren't just a question of pay and
benefits. As Greg said, it's indentured servitude. Job security, at the
bottom of it all.
I've been blacklisted in two CUNY schools. In the first, I was fired
without any reason given, filed a grievance (I realize in many places,
adjuncts can't even do that), won a financial settlement and am banned
from working there. In the other, I rejected imposition of additional
hours and started to file a grievance over increased class size, and ---
*bang*. I can't work there anymore.
In the latter, the "unfavorable student evaluations" club came into play.
This in itself has led colleagues to lower standards in their classes,
with the aim of getting favorable student evaluations.
The patronal element also plays a solidarity-busting role. At the second
CUNY school mentioned above, the department chair was the wife of one of
my advisors, so I was expected to go along with the bullshit.
More information about the Marxism