[Marxism] Irrational Exuberance
Ruthless Critic of All that Exists
ok.president+marxml at gmail.com
Thu Jul 31 19:53:09 MDT 2008
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Walter Lippmann <walterlx at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Anyone who has read Fidel's "endorsement", which characterized
> the Soviet intervention as a violation of Czechoslovakian
> sovereignty understands immediately why the Soviet Union was
> unable to publish Fidel's "endorsement" in the Soviet press,
> not to speak of in the Czechoslovakian media at the time.
Fidel Castro on Czechoslovakia in 1968:
(Excerpts from two speeches by Fidel Castro on August 23rd and 24th
1968, attacking the "counter-revolutionary" anti-Stalinist movement in
Czechoslovakia and supporting the USSR's invasion. )
August 23, 1968
Fidel Castro Ruz
Right here, I wish to make the first important affirmation: we
considered that Czechoslovakia was moving toward a
counter-revolutionary situation. Toward capitalism and into the arms
So this defines our first position in relation to the specific fact of
the action taken by a group of socialist countries. That is, we
consider that it was absolutely necessary, at all cost, in one way or
another, to prevent this eventuality from taking place. ...
Discussion of the form is not, in the final analysis, the most
fundamental factor. The essential point to be accepted, or not
accepted, is whether or not the socialist camp could allow a political
situation to develop which would lead to the breaking away of a
socialist country, to its falling into the arms of imperialism. And
our point of view is that it is not permissible and that the socialist
camp has a right to prevent this in one way or another. I would like
to begin by making it clear that we look upon this fact as an
essential one. ...
A real liberal fury was unleashed; a whole series of political slogans
in favor of the formation of opposition parties began to develop, in
favor of open anti-Marxist and anti-Leninist theses, such as the
thesis that the Party should cease to play the role which the Party
plays within socialist society and begin to play the role there of a
guide, supervising some things but, above all, exerting a sort of
spiritual leadership. In short, that the reins of power should cease
to be in the hands of the Communist Party.
The revision of certain fundamental postulates to the effect that a
socialist regime is a transition regime from socialism to communism, a
governmental form known as the dictatorship of the proletariat. This
means a government where power is wielded in behalf of one class and
against the former exploiting classes by virtue of which in a
revolutionary process political rights, the right to carry on
political activities -- whose objective is precisely to struggle
against the essence and the raison d'etre of socialism - cannot be
granted to the former exploiters.
A series of slogans began to be put forward and in fact certain
measures were taken such as the establishment of the bourgeois
"freedom" of the press. This means that the counter-revolution and the
exploiters, the very enemies of socialism, were granted the right to
speak and write freely against socialism.
As a matter of fact, a process of seizure of the principal information
media by the reactionary elements began to develop. As regards foreign
policy, a whole series of slogans of open rapprochement toward
capitalist concepts and theses and of rapprochement towards the West
On many occasions the imperialists have publicly stated what their
policy is in relation to the socialist countries of Eastern Europe.
And in Congress, in the press, they always talk about encouraging the
liberal tendencies and even about promoting, of making available, some
selective economic aid and of using every means of contributing to
creating an opposition to socialism there. The imperialists are
carrying out a campaign, not only in Czechoslovakia, but in all the
countries of Eastern Europe, even in the Soviet Union.
Opinion on Intervention
August 24, 1968
Fidel Castro Ruz
I wish to quickly make the first important statement that we considered
Czechoslovakia to be heading toward a counterrevolutionary situation,
toward capitalism and into the arms of imperialism. This is the operative
concept in our first position toward the specific fact of the action taken
by a group of socialist countries. That is, we consider that it was
unavoidable to prevent this from happening - at any cost, in one way or
Of course, let us not become impatient, because we propose to analyze this
in line with our ideas. Discussing the form is not really the most
fundamental thing. The essential thing, whether we accept it or not, is
whether the socialist bloc could permit the development of a political
situation which lead to the breakdown of a socialist country and its fall
into the arms of imperialism. From our viewpoint, it is not permissible and
the socialist bloc has the right to prevent it in one way or another.
We first wish to begin by establishing what our opinion is about this
essential matter. Now, it is not enough to explain simply that
Czechoslovakia was heading toward a counterevolutionary situation and that
it had to be stopped. It is not enough to conclude simply that the only
alternative was to prevent it and nothing more. We must analyze the causes
and determine the factors which made possible and necessary such a
dramatic, drastic, and painful remedy. What are the factors which required
a step unquestionably involving a violation of legal principles and of
international standards, which have often served as shields for peoples
against injustices and are so highly regarded in the world?
What is not appropriate here is to say that the sovereignty of the
Czechoslovak state was not violated. That would be fiction and a lie. The
violation was flagrant, and on this we are going to talk about the effect
on sovereignty, and on legal and political principles. From the legal
viewpoint, it cannot be justified. This is quite clear. In our judgment,
the decision on Czechoslovakia can be explained only from the political
viewpoint and not from a legal viewpoint. Frankly, it has absolutely no
What are the circumstances that have permitted a remedy of this nature, a
remedy which places in a difficult situation the entire world revolutionary
movement, a remedy which constitutes a really traumatic situation for an
entire people - as is the present case in Czechoslovakia - a remedy which
implies that an entire nation has to pass through the most unpleasant
circumstances of seeing the country occupied by armies of other countries,
although they are armies of the socialist countries. A situation in which
millions of beings of a country have to see themselves today in the tragic
circumstance of electing and choosing either to be passive toward these
circumstances and this event--which so much brings to mind previous
episodes - or to struggle in comradeship with pro-Yankee agents and spies,
the enemies of socialism, the agents of West Germany, and all that fascist
and reactionary rabble that in the heat of these circumstances will try to
present itself as champions of the sovereignty, patriotism, and freedom of
Logically, for the Czechoslovak people this experience and this fact
constitute a better and tragic situation. Therefore, it is not enough
simply to conclude that it has arisen as an inexorable necessity and even,
if you wish, as an unquestionable obligation of the socialist countries to
prevent such events from happening. [One must inquire] what are the cases,
the factors, and the circumstances that brought forth - after 20 years of
communism in Czechoslovakia - a group of persons whose names do not even
appear anywhere, and this petition directed to other countries of the
socialist camp, asking them to send their armies to prevent the triumph of
the counterrevolution in Czechoslovakia and the triumph of the intrigues
and conspiracies of the imperialist countries interested in breaking
Czechoslovakia from the community of socialist countries?
Could it be imagined, gentlemen, that at the end of 20 years of communism
in our country - of communist revolution, of socialist revolution--that
under any circumstances it could happen that a group of honest
revolutionaries in this country, terrified at the prospects of an advance
or, better said, of a retrogression toward counterrevolutionary positions
and imperialism, would see the need of asking the aid of friendly armies to
prevent such a situation from occurring?
What would have remained of the communist consciousness of this people?
What would have remained of the revolutionary consciousness of this people,
of the dignity of this people, of the revolutionary morale of this people?
What would have remained of all those things that mean for us essentially
the revolution if such circumstances should one day arise?
But no circumstances of that kind will ever occur in our country. First,
because we believe that it is a duty and fundamental responsibility of
those who direct a revolution to prevent deformations of such a nature that
might make possible such circumstances. Secondly, gentlemen, for an
unquestionably practical reason and not only a moral elemental reason,
because we could ask if it would be worth the trouble if, after 20 years,
to survive a revolution one had to resort to such procedures. And also, for
a very simple practical reason: who would false personalities of this
country ask to send armies? The only armies that we have in our vicinity
are the Yankee army and the armies of the puppets allied with the Yankee
imperialists, the because we are too alone in this part of the world for
there ever to exist the most remote possibility of saving this revolution
by asking aid of allied armies.
And it must be said that I do not know anyone capable of having enough
shame to do such a thing if they had the need and opportunity to do it,
because what kind of communists would we be and what kind of communist
revolution would this be if at the end of 20 years we found ourselves
having to do such a thing to save it?
Always, when we have thought about foreign aid, we have never had the idea
of foreign aid to fight against the imperialist soldiers and against the
imperialist armies. I simply analyze these facts because I know that,
legally, our people are concerned with an explanation of these concepts.
Such things are not in our idea of the revolution.
I do not think that a person can justify the appeal of high-ranking
persons, because the justification can only be the political fact in
itself - that Czechoslovakia was marching toward a counterrevolutionary
situation and this was seriously affecting the entire socialist community.
And besides, there is no lack of figleaves of any kind. It is the political
fact in itself, with all its consequences and all its importance. As we
were saying, recognizing that and nothing else is simply enough.
Or if it is obligatory, it is elementary to draw from this most bitter
experience all the political conclusions. And as it is possible, we repeat:
In these circumstances, an analysis must be made of all the factors. For
the communist movement, there is the unavoidable duty of investigating
deeply the causes leading to such a situation, a situation inconceivable
for us, the Cuban revolutionaries. If such action is impossible for us
Cuban revolutionaries - we who saw the necessity for carrying out this
revolution 90 miles from imperialism - we also know that we cannot fall into
these circumstances because it would mean the very end of the revolution
and falling into the worst situation, provoked by our enemies,
full of hatred. But this is not the reason for making or trying to make
this profound analysis.
More information about the Marxism