[Marxism] Anti child 'porn' measure is really NewsGroup censorship

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Mon Jun 16 16:39:29 MDT 2008

Joaquin wrote:
>Last week the NY Attorney General and some USPS, Verizon and Time
>Warner's Road Runner, announced an agreement to block alleged "child
>porn" web sites -- or at least so claimed the New York Times.

Speaking of which.

Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Saturday June 14, 11:35 pm ET

Some people use the Internet simply to check e-mail and look up phone 
numbers. Others are online all day, downloading big video and music files.

For years, both kinds of Web surfers have paid the same price for 
access. But now three of the country's largest Internet service 
providers are threatening to clamp down on their most active 
subscribers by placing monthly limits on their online activity.

One of them, Time Warner Cable, began a trial of "Internet metering" 
in one Texas city early this month, asking customers to select a 
monthly plan and pay surcharges when they exceed their bandwidth 
limit. The idea is that people who use the network more heavily 
should pay more, the way they do for water, electricity, or, in many 
cases, cellphone minutes.

That same week, Comcast said that it would expand on a strategy it 
uses to manage Internet traffic: slowing down the connections of the 
heaviest users, so-called bandwidth hogs, at peak times.

AT&T also said Thursday that limits on heavy use were inevitable and 
that it was considering pricing based on data volume. "Based on 
current trends, total bandwidth in the AT&T network will increase by 
four times over the next three years," the company said in a statement.

All three companies say that placing caps on broadband use will 
ensure fair access for all users.

Internet metering is a throwback to the days of dial-up service, but 
at a time when video and interactive games are becoming popular, the 
experiments could have huge implications for the future of the Web.

Millions of people are moving online to watch movies and television 
shows, play multiplayer video games and talk over videoconference 
with family and friends. And media companies are trying to get people 
to spend more time online: the Disneys and NBCs of the world keep 
adding television shows and movies to their Web sites, giving 
consumers convenient entertainment that soaks up a lot of bandwidth.

Moreover, companies with physical storefronts, like Blockbuster, are 
moving toward digital delivery of entertainment. And new distributors 
of online content — think YouTube — are relying on an open data 
spigot to make their business plans work.

Critics of the bandwidth limits say that metering and capping network 
use could hold back the inevitable convergence of television, 
computers and the Internet.

The Internet "is how we deliver our shows," said Jim Louderback, 
chief executive of Revision3, a three-year-old media company that 
runs what it calls a television network on the Web. "If all of a 
sudden our viewers are worried about some sort of a broadband cap, 
they may think twice about downloading or watching our shows."

Even if the caps are far above the average users' consumption, their 
mere existence could cause users to reduce their time online. Just 
ask people who carefully monitor their monthly allotments of 
cellphone minutes and text messages.

"As soon as you put serious uncertainty as to cost on the table, 
people's feeling of freedom to predict cost dries up and so does 
innovation and trying new applications," Vint Cerf, the chief 
Internet evangelist for Google who is often called the "father of the 
Internet," said in an e-mail message.

But the companies imposing the caps say that their actions are only 
fair. People who use more network capacity should pay more, Time 
Warner argues. And Comcast says that people who use too much — like 
those who engage in file-sharing — should be forced to slow down.

Time Warner also frames the issue in financial terms: the broadband 
infrastructure needs to be improved, it says, and maybe metering 
could pay for the upgrades. So far its trial is limited to new 
subscribers in Beaumont, Tex., a city of roughly 110,000.

In that trial, new customers can buy plans with a 5-gigabyte cap, a 
20-gigabyte cap or a 40-gigabyte cap. Prices for those plans range 
from $30 to $50. Above the cap, customers pay $1 a gigabyte. Plans 
with higher caps come with faster service.

"Average customers are way below the caps," said Kevin Leddy, 
executive vice president for advanced technology at Time Warner 
Cable. "These caps give them years' worth of growth before they'd 
ever pay any surcharges."

Casual Internet users who merely send e-mail messages, check movie 
times and read the news are not likely to exceed the caps. But people 
who watch television shows on Hulu.com, rent movies on iTunes or play 
the multiplayer game Halo on Xbox may start to exceed the limits — 
and millions of people are already doing those things.

Streaming an hour of video on Hulu, which shows programs like 
"Saturday Night Live," "Family Guy" and "The Daily Show With Jon 
Stewart," consumes about 200 megabytes, or one-fifth of a gigabyte. A 
higher-quality hour of the same content bought through Apple's iTunes 
store can use about 500 megabytes, or half a gigabyte.

A high-definition episode of <object.title class="Movie" 
idsrc="nyt_ttl" value="48007">"Survivor"</object.title> on CBS.com 
can use up to a gigabyte, and a DVD-quality movie through Netflix's 
new online service can eat up about five gigabytes. One Netflix 
download alone, in fact, could bring a user to the limit on the 
cheapest plan in Time Warner's trial in Beaumont.

Even services like Skype and Vonage that use the Internet to transmit 
phone calls could help put users over the monthly limits.

Time Warner would not reveal how many gigabytes an average customer 
uses, saying only that 95 percent of customers use under 40 gigabytes 
each in a month.

That means that 5 percent of customers use more than 50 percent of 
the network's overall capacity, the company said, and many of those 
people are assumed to be sharing copyrighted video and music files illegally.

The Time Warner plan has the potential to bring Internet use full 
circle, back to the days when pay-as-you-go pricing held back the 
Web's popularity. In the early days of dial-up access, America Online 
and other providers offered tiered pricing, in part because audio and 
video were barely viable online. Consumers feared going over their 
allotted time and bristled at the idea that access to cyberspace was 
billed by the hour.

In 1996, when AOL started offering unlimited access plans, Internet 
use took off and the online world started moving to the center of 
people's daily lives. Today most Internet packages provide a 
seemingly unlimited amount of capacity, at least from the consumer's 

But like water and electricity, even digital resources are finite. 
Last year Comcast disclosed that it was temporarily turning off the 
connections of customers who used file-sharing services like 
BitTorrent, arguing that they were slowing things down for everyone 
else. The people who got cut off complained and asked how much 
broadband use was too much; the company did not have a ready answer.

Thus, like Time Warner, Comcast is considering a form of Internet 
metering that would apply to all online activity.

The goal, says Mitch Bowling, a senior vice president at Comcast, is 
"ensuring that a small number of users don't impact the experience 
for everyone else."

Last year Comcast was sued when it was disclosed that the company had 
singled out BitTorrent users.

In February, Comcast departed from that approach and started 
collaborating with the company that runs BitTorrent. Now it has 
shifted to what it calls a "platform agnostic" approach to managing 
its network, meaning that it slows down the connection of any 
customer who uses too much bandwidth at congested times.

Mr. Bowling said that "typical Internet usage" would not be affected. 
But on the Internet, "typical" use is constantly being redefined.

"The definitions of low and high usage today are meaningless, because 
the Internet's going to grow, and nothing's going to stop that," said 
Eric Klinker, the chief technology officer of BitTorrent.

As the technology company Cisco put it in a recent report, "today's 
'bandwidth hog' is tomorrow's average user."

One result of these experiments is a tug-of-war between the Internet 
providers and media companies, which are monitoring the Time Warner 
experiment with trepidation.

"We hate it," said a senior executive at a major media company, who 
requested anonymity because his company, like all broadcasters, must 
play nice with the same cable operators that are imposing the limits. 
Now that some television shows are viewed millions of times online, 
the executive said, any impediment would hurt the advertising model 
for online video streaming.

Mr. Leddy of Time Warner said that the media companies' fears were 
overblown. If the company were to try to stop Web video, "we would 
not succeed," he said. "We know how much capacity they're going to 
need in the future, and we know what it's going to cost. And today's 
business model doesn't pay for it very well."

More information about the Marxism mailing list