[Marxism] Nader on Obama's Hundred Days

Mark Lause markalause at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 00:08:08 MDT 2009


Ralph Nader issues statement on Obama’s first 100 Days
April 25th, 2009

“No more fine print; no more confusing terms and conditions.”  This is
what Barack Obama told a White House gathering of leading credit card
issuers this week.

Right afterward, President Obama told the press that “there has to be
strong and reliable protections for consumers, protections that ban
unfair rate increases and forbid abusive fees and penalties.”

This soaring rhetoric places a heavy burden on Mr. Obama to stand up
to the giant power of the credit card bosses and their monetized
allies on Capitol Hill.  Yet he has shown little interest in
re-instating a Presidential consumer advisor as did Lyndon Johnson
with the formidable Betty Furness and as did Jimmy Carter with the
legendary Esther Peterson.

Deep recession times are tough for the nation’s over 200 million
consumers.  Still, no consumer voice in the White House, though
consumer groups asked Mr. Obama to move promptly on this tiny advocacy
office months ago.

The corporate chieftains have easy access to the White House and the
new President, whether these bosses come on missions demanding power
or missions of beggary for bailouts.  When will he meet with the
leading heads of consumer protection groups with millions of
dues-paying members who could give him the base to hold accountable
and regulate the democracy-denying, economy-wrecking corporate
supremacists?

“Where’s the Backbone?” asked Ruth Marcus, the usually-restrained
lawyer-columnist for The Washington Post.  On April 15, 2009 she
wrote: “When will President Obama fight, and when will he fold?
That’s not entirely clear—and I’m beginning to worry that there may be
a little too much presidential inclination to crumple.”  Ms. Marcus
asserts that “for all the chest-thumping about making hard choices and
taking on entrenched interests, there has been disturbingly little
evidence of the new president’s willingness to do that.”  This is the
case even with his allies in Congress, never mind his adversaries.

Just four days later, The New York Times weighed in with a page one
news article that said President Obama “is well known for bold
proposals that have raised expectations, but his administration has
shown a tendency for compromise and caution, and even a willingness to
capitulate on some early initiatives. …His early willingness to deal
or fold has left commentators, and some loyal Democrats, wondering:
‘Where’s the fight?’”  Like the Post, the Times gave examples.

It is not as if Mr. Obama is lacking in public opinion support.
Overall he has a 65% approval rating.  People know he inherited a
terrible situation here and abroad from the Bush regime and they want
action.  Large majorities believe America is declining, that there is
too much corporate control over their lives, and that the two parties
have been failing the American people.

But the President’s personality is not one to challenge concentrated
power.  A Zogby poll reports that only six percent of the public
supports the financial bailouts for Wall Street.  The vast majority of
people do not think the bailouts are fair.

The upcoming 100 day mark for the Obama administration is a customary
time for evaluations by the politicos, the pundits, and the civic
community.  While his supporters can point to the pay-equity law for
women, more health insurance for poor children, and a $787 billion
economic stimulus enactment, the general appraisal by the
liberal-progressive intelligentsia is decidedly mixed and gentle with
undiluted hope.

Mr. Obama nourishes these mixed feelings.  He showed some courage when
he agreed, as part of an ongoing court case, to release the four
torture memos written by Bush’s Justice Department.  Graphic photos of
prisoner treatment in Iraq and Afghanistan are to be released next
week.  Yet Obama came out against a Truth Commission regarding the
alleged crimes of the Bush regime and said he would “look forward and
not look back.”  For Obama that means immunity for anyone from the
Bush Administration who may have violated the criminal laws of the
land.

It is remarkable to read those oft-repeated words by lawyer Obama.
Law enforcement is about looking back into the past.  Investigation
and prosecution obviously deals with crimes that have already
occurred.  That’s the constitutional duty of the President.

After 100 days it is far too early to render many judgments about
Obama.  One can, however, evaluate his major appointments—heavily
Clintonite and corporate.  One can also look at what he hasn’t gotten
underway at all—such as labor law reform, a living wage, and citizen
empowerment.

Next Monday, the Institute for Policy Studies (www.ips-dc.org)
releases a detailed report card on Obama’s first 100 days titled
“Thirsting for a Change.”  While The Nation held a panel discussion on
April 22 in Washington, D.C., the panelists largely gave Obama the
benefit of the doubt so far, and declared that only grassroots
mobilizing will move him forward on such matters as “single-payer”
health care, corporate abuse, and the demilitarization of our foreign
policy and our federal budget.

Panelist William Grieder coined the phrase “independent formulations”
to describe the citizen action needed.

It is important to note that a transforming President has to ask for
and encourage this pressure from the citizenry, much as Franklin
Delano Roosevelt did in the 1930s.

http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/04/ralph-nader-issues-statement-on-obamas-first-100-days/




More information about the Marxism mailing list