[Marxism] US officials contest top Israeli gen.'s claim Iran can now make n-weapon

Fred Feldman ffeldman at bellatlantic.net
Wed Mar 11 03:10:26 MDT 2009


Admiral Blair's public disagreement with the Israeli war propaganda on Iran
plus his apparent down-to-the-wire support for the now-defunct Freeman
nomination (also noted below) indicates that we can expect him to be
targeted for early departure by AIPAC and the powerful ultra-pro-Israel
forces in both parties. Their chances of success look fairly good given the
president's quiet but noticeable fold on Freeman.
Fred Feldman



http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-03-10-officials_N.htm
 
Officials: Iran does not have key nuclear material
By PAMELA HESS, Associated Press Writer Pamela Hess, Associated Press Writer

Tue Mar 10, 7:38 pm ET
 
WASHINGTON - Iran does not yet have any highly enriched uranium, the fuel
needed to make a nuclear warhead, two top U.S. intelligence officials told
Congress Tuesday, disputing a claim by an Israeli official.

U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair and Defense Intelligence
Agency Director Lt. Gen. Michael Maples said Tuesday that Iran has only
low-enriched uranium - which would need to be refined into highly enriched
uranium before it can fuel a warhead. Neither officials said there were
indications that refining has occurred.

Their comments disputed a claim made last weekend by Israel's top
intelligence military official, who said Iran has crossed a technical
threshold and is now capable of producing atomic weapons.

The claim made by Israeli Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin runs counter to estimates by
U.S. intelligence that the earliest Iran could produce a weapon is 2010,
with some analysts saying it is more likely that it is 2015.

Maples said the United States and Israel are interpreting the same facts,
but arriving at different conclusions.

"The Israelis are far more concerned about it," Maples told the Senate Armed
Services Committee.

The status of Iran's nuclear program has been the subject of conflicting
public statements by top military and intelligence officials recently in the
wake of U.N. revelations that Iran has more low-enriched uranium than
previously thought.

Earlier this month, Defense Sec. Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff
Chairman Adm.. Mike Mullen differed over Iran's capability. While Mullen
said Iran has sufficient fission material for a bomb, Gates insisted
"they're not close to a weapon at this point."

Maples also told the committee that insurgent violence in Afghanistan has
gotten more ferocious in the last year even as violence in Iraq declined.

The use of roadside bombs in Afghanistan more than doubled in 2008 over the
previous year, and attacks overall increased by 55 percent from 2007 to
2008. Suicide bombings increased by 21 percent and small-arms attacks
increased by 33 percent.

Some of these trends reflect more aggressive military operations in Taliban
strongholds by U.S. and other NATO forces, Maples said.

Maples said the Somali extremist group al-Shabaab is poised to formally
merge with al-Qaida, expanding the terrorist franchise in East Africa. An
analysis of the propaganda released by both groups recently highlights their
ideological similarities, suggesting a merger is forthcoming, Maples said.

Al-Shabaab conducts almost daily attacks in Somalia. A merger would
strengthen al-Qaida's foothold in East Africa.

The two groups have long been suspected of working together, but they have
not yet announced a formal alliance. Al-Qaida has operations in north
Africa, Yemen and Iraq.

Blair said National Security Agency is poised to take a lead role in
protecting U.S. computer networks from cyber attacks. The NSA - tarnished in
the public view by its role in the Bush-era "warrantless wiretapping"
program - now conducts clandestine computer attacks on U.S. adversaries, and
could use those skills to protect U.S. networks from similar attacks.

He said it must be done under strict oversight to make sure it is not
gathering private American information that violates privacy and civil
liberties laws.

Blair also stood firm behind former U.S. Ambassador Charles Freeman, his
pick for a top analysis job, despite strong congressional criticism.

Freeman, who was U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia during the Persian Gulf
war, had harshly criticized the Israeli government, the Iraq war and the war
on terrorism in general. 

A policy council Freeman headed also has been criticized for some ties to
foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia and China. Blair's inspector
general is investigating those ties while Freeman works with ethics advisers
to scrub his personal finances for potential conflicts of interest. 

Blair has tapped Freeman to head the National Intelligence Council, which
analyzes critical national security issues drawing from all U.S.
intelligence agencies. The National Intelligence Estimates are meant to be
unvarnished and apolitical. 

Blair said Freeman's strong opinions are exactly why he wants him to be
chairman of the council. 

"I think I can do a better job if I am getting strong analytical viewpoints
than if I am getting pre-cooked pablum," Blair said. 

The seven Republican members of the Senate Intelligence Committee sent a
letter to Blair Monday expressing concerns about Freeman's suitability for
the job. They joined more than a dozen members of the House who over the
last two weeks have sent similar letters and requested the IG investigation.

Copyright C 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information
contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten
or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated
Press. 


Copyright C 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.Questions or
CommentsPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCopyright/IP Poli






More information about the Marxism mailing list