[Marxism] Here is the correct link: sorry
sartesian at earthlink.net
Sun Sep 20 23:18:03 MDT 2009
Disagree with your interpretation that the workers [of Britain] had an
"immediate interest" in supporting the Confederacy-- as the cotton from the
South meant employment in textile mills.
What distinguishes Marxist analysis from political economy is not politics
vs. economy, or politics over economic interest, but the social struggle for
the emancipation of labor.
Saying workers had an immediate interest in supporting the Confederacy as it
meant employment is like saying GM workers have an immediate interest in the
government bailout as then SOME of them might be able to keep their jobs.
But Marxist analysis, as opposed to political economy in conservative or
reformist dress, begins with the social organization of labor, and so the
immediate interest of the working class is in fact the interest of the class
as a whole, not for some, not for those employed in the textile mills, but
for the class as a whole. So the immediate interest of the working class
was not just for the defeat of the Confederacy, for the end to slavery, but
for the emancipation of black labor.
The immediate interest and the ultimate interest are not distinct and
oppositional, but mediated, and when mediated by the class acting as a
whole, or for itself, we get the end to political economy.
Anyway, that's why I think there is no such thing as Marxist political
----- Original Message -----
From: "michael perelman" <michael at ecst.csuchico.edu>
To: "David Schanoes" <sartesian at earthlink.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 11:32 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Here is the correct link: sorry
> Here is the correct link
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA
> 530 898 5321
> fax 530 898 5901
> YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
More information about the Marxism