[Marxism] Shirley Sherrod for President

Dennis Brasky dmozart1756 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 1 20:28:08 MDT 2010

Featured <http://www.race-talk.org/?cat=7>, Shirley
US <http://www.race-talk.org/?cat=91>,
Women<http://www.race-talk.org/?cat=114>— By Duchess
Harris <http://www.race-talk.org/?author=22> on July 26, 2010 at 2:46 pm


Exactly one year ago, I published a book entitled, *Black Feminist Politics
from Kennedy to Clinton <http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=128160085690>
*.  My publisher, Palgrave Macmillan, has decided to re-print in paperback
and they’d like me to change the title to “…*from Kennedy to Obama*” and add
a chapter about the President.

I’ve been blogging since April 2009 and haven’t written much about President
Obama, a deliberate choice, because I am reflective in nature.

By chance, my publisher asked me to write about the Obama administration’s
treatment of Black women the week of the Shirley Sherrod incident.

I don’t know how much I can add to this conversation now that New York Times
columnist, Bob Herbert wrote a brilliant piece entitled, “Shirley Sherrod
Thrown to the Wolves.”  His opening paragraph is insightful,“The Shirley
Sherrod story tells us so much about ourselves, and none of it is pretty.
The most obvious and shameful fact is that the Obama administration, which
runs from race issues the way thoroughbreds bolt from the starting gate, did
not offer this woman anything resembling fair or respectful treatment before
firing and publicly humiliating her.”

When I read Herbert’s comments I thought, “How is this any different from
either Lani Guinier or Dr. Joycelyn Elders?”

Many Black women were hopeful about possibilities for their own expanded
involvement in the political arena in January 1993 with the inauguration of
President Clinton, his choice of Maya Angelou as inaugural poet, and his
attempt to put Blacks in his Presidential cabinet. Shortly after his
inauguration, Clinton nominated his friend and former classmate Lani Guinier
to the prestigious and crucial post of Assistant Attorney General for Civil

Guinier’s nomination sparked an immediate firestorm of criticism from the
right, which labeled Professor Guinier “Quota Queen”, and assailed her for
ideas expressed in her publications, most of which her opponents had not
read, or which they had taken out of context and misunderstood. In the face
of opposition — what one friend of Guinier’s called a “low-tech lynching” —
Clinton backed down, not only withdrawing her nomination, but refusing to
afford Guinier the opportunity to speak out in her own defense (and, of
course, his). The result was a civil rights setback of monumental

Unfortunately, the Guinier embarrassment was followed by the scandal that
engulfed Dr. Joycelyn Elders, nominated by Clinton in July of the same year,
to be Surgeon General.

On December 9, 1994, Clinton asked her to resign after Elders answered a
physician’s question at a professional meeting. She said teaching facts
about masturbation might well be included in educating school children about
their sexuality. Clinton’s response was, “Well, I’m sorry but we can’t just
have any more of this and I want your resignation by 2:30 P.M.” An ousted
official normally is permitted to maintain the illusion she has voluntarily
stepped aside, and there is a polite exchange of letters. The White House
took pains to make clear Clinton demanded Elders leave.

Not much has changed with the Obama Administration. Sixteen years
later, Maureen
Dowd noted <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/opinion/25dowd.html>, “The
West Wing white guys who pushed to ditch Shirley Sherrod before Glenn Beck
could pounce not only didn’t bother to Google, they weren’t familiar enough
with civil rights history to recognize the name Sherrod. And they didn’t
return the calls and e-mail of prominent Blacks who tried to alert them that
something was wrong. Charles Sherrod, Shirley’s husband, was a Freedom Rider
who, along with the civil rights hero John Lewis, was a key member of the
Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee of the ‘60s.”

Dowd’s column is provocative, but I disagree with several points.  She
argues, “We may not have a nation of cowards on race, as Attorney General
Eric Holder contended, but we may have a West Wing of cowards on race.”  I
think we have both.

Dowd also argues “…Obama lacks advisers who are descended from the central
African-American experience, ones who understand “the slave thing,” as a top
Black Democrat dryly puts it.”  She posits that Bill Clinton never needed
help fathoming Southern Black culture.  The only aspect  ringing true is
Blacks in the South still have a “place,” and President Clinton tried to
keep them there.

When it comes to race relations, what’s the difference between the first
white President to be thought of as Black, and the first President who
actually is?  Not much.  As I think about both administrations, I ask myself
if our expectations were too high for the man from Hope and the man who
offered us change we could believe in.

Dowd ends her column stating, “The President shouldn’t give Sherrod her old
job back. He should give her a new job: Director of Black Outreach.”

Actually, if we want better race relations, Shirley Sherrod should be the

More information about the Marxism mailing list