[Marxism] Scope and Limits of Theory: Provisional Draft
lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Jul 7 09:11:48 MDT 2010
S. Artesian wrote:
> While the moderator disavows the distinction between a "moral basis" and
> historical necessity, the assertion that 20th century revolutions have
> nothing to do with Marx's analysis of value cuts the ground out from under
> the equally Marxist determination of historical necessity.
Let me make this crystal clear. The analysis of capitalist
exploitation in Capital and other such works is the foundation for
socialist revolution. It would be truly ridiculous for me or
anybody else to disagree with this.
But to repeat, the insight that the abolition of class society
based on commodity production is a sine qua non for communism is
*USELESS* for developing strategy and tactics. When
revolutionaries participate in the class struggle, they have to
have an analysis--for example--of the relationship of class
forces. In Nicaragua, the "informal sector" was critical in the
fight against Somoza. In Czarist Russia and in China, the
peasantry was an important social class.
My problem with Angelus is that his harping on commodity form
analysis is disengaged from anything he has ever written about the
*living class struggle*, although I have to admit that I have
never seen him actually address it. I simply don't understand how
a deep reading of the Grundrisse will help activists fight against
German xenophobia and attacks on the trade unions more effectively.
That is why I find his support for a classless society so besides
the point. Our task is to move the class struggle forward so as to
create a powerful challenge to the capitalist system in the *here
and now* that might culminate in the workers taking power. You
can't get to communism without overthrowing capitalism, right?
That is why the focus is on strategy and tactics here. That is why
we examine how new political parties like Die Linke might be the
first step in creating a powerful anti-capitalist alternative in
Those are the kinds of questions that the Bolsheviks dealt with as
well. They were always examining openings that could lead to
advances in the struggle against Czarism. If you study the history
of the Cuban revolution, you will see the same kinds of
preoccupation. Whether to support one candidate or another against
Batista or to launch guerrilla warfare. Studying the commodity
form would seem to be a distraction from that effort, although I
am sure that Fidel Castro did have that in the back of his mind
when he was on the Granma.
More information about the Marxism