[Marxism] Turn in DSK case....(reformatted)
shmage at pipeline.com
Sun Jul 3 10:20:04 MDT 2011
On Jul 3, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Les Schaffer wrote:
>> Except that no "physical evidence" exists. In his hysterical
>> delusion that nobody has ever been convicted of raping anyone who
>> can't be proven to be a "secular saint," Fred simply throws down
>> the memory hole the crucial "revelation" that the prosecution team
>> (under the strongest legal obligation) was compelled to disclose:
>> that the extortionist initially lied to them about her conduct
>> after the supposed encounter
> ummmmm, i cannot stand idly by and watching this sexist tripe being
> spilled on this list
> anyone who can read a newspaper can see how Shane's stance is blame-
> the-woman run amuck.
Why the hysterical insults?
Because Les realizes that she perjured herself before the Grand Jury?
Because he realizes that the perjuring accuser did so to hide the fact
that she had been in sole control of the "evidence" before making her
Because he realizes that she expected a huge financial gain?
Because he realizes that a real investigation will reveal a
transparently *justified* "conspiracy theory?"
Any reason to think that the correct answer ain't *all of the above*?
"scientific discovery is basically recognition of obvious realities
that self-interest or ideology have kept everybody from paying
More information about the Marxism