[Marxism] Marxism Digest, Vol 106, Issue 16
lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Aug 8 13:32:38 MDT 2012
On 8/8/12 2:32 PM, audradavid at aol.com wrote:
> But is not this sorry result in Ireland precisely why one should not
> have a romantic view of an opposition in Syria that brings together
> all sorts of elements, from socialists through democrats of various
> stripes to outright religious reactionaries? Should we not be looking
> at precisely what the opposition in Syria represents, what currents
> there are within it and which ones should be supported, rather than
> condemning the opposition in toto as a reactionary puppet of the big
> powers, or conversely cheer-leading it in an utterly uncritical
In Ireland there was a national liberation movement based to a large
degree on socialist ideas that grew out of "civil society". In Libya and
Syria there has been nothing like this in memory. In Libya it was a
crime to organize a party outside of Qaddafi's and in Syria the CP
basically functions as an auxiliary of the Baathist Party, in some
respects resembling the CPUSA and the Democrats.
People mainly protested in the early months to get rid of the State of
Emergency Laws and to allow a modicum of democratic rights to exist so
that ideas about a future society could begin to be openly discussed. As
a payment for that demand, they got bullets in their head from snipers.
And after many hundreds, if not thousands, died in the streets in
peaceful protests, some Syrians began to arm themselves in order to
defend the protests.
For this they have been labeled by the
Chossudovsky/MRZine/Voltairenet/Counterpunch/PSL wing of the left as a
kind of UNITA or Nicaraguan contra because they got guns from Turkey or
Saudi Arabia. They of course would have been condemned out of hand even
if they used bows and arrows made out of olive branches because they
dared rise up against one of the "good guys", like Qaddafi, Mugabe, and
Ahmadinejad. It is enough to induce projectile vomiting.
More information about the Marxism