[Marxism] Ecuador: 'We are not a colony!' Foreign minister denounces British threat to raid its embassy
gary.maclennan1 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 01:41:52 MDT 2012
Well Stuart you could be right. We will see, but storming an embassy is
like very serious stuff, and I don't think there is any precedent for
Britain acting in this way. I think it is more likely a case of playing
for very high stakes.
You are of course right in that the fuss shows what all this is about. the
hand of America is all over this. But we should not forget how this will
play out in Latin America. British economic interests are very much a
factor in South America.
The Guardian thinks Correa is using Assange to build his Left wing
credentials. And of course that is a tacit admission that to support
Assange is to be Left wing..
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Stuart Munckton
<stuartmunckton at gmail.com>wrote:
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> > What happens next will be very interesting. I discount the storming of
> > embassy by British police. That would be a crass and politically stupid
> > thing to do. Ditto for any move to cancel the embassy's lease. But you
> > never know. The storm outside the British embassy in Quito would not have
> > gone unnoticed.
> I am not convinced the storming is unlikely. Ecuador claims it received
> written warning by Britain that unless it handed over Assange, Britain
> would revoke the embassy's standing as an embassy -- removing its
> diplomatic protection. I am not sure if they have any basis to do that -- I
> have heard it said they really, really don't -- but they at least have made
> that threat. And clarified it themselves. They said if Ecuador does not
> grant Assange asylum (and decision in a few hours), then they will
> immediately move in and arrest him. If they *do*, the threat is Britain
> will remove the diplomatic protection, and if they don;t hand him over in a
> week, go in.
> Whether they will is another question. And that may well depend on the
> response to their actions so far. But they appear to have actually made the
> threat, and that presumably means it is a serious option on the table.
> One thing this does, surely, is blow away the whole pretense this is all
> about Assange going to Sweden to be *questioned* about sexual assault
> allegations. No one, not the most demented commentator, could seriously
> suggest Britain would virtually declare war on Ecuador so someone can be
> sent to another country to be questioned over allegations they haven;t even
> been charged with.
> Then again, it is hard to overstate how demented the level of commentary in
> bourgeois press actually is.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
More information about the Marxism