lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Dec 5 07:30:17 MST 2012
On 12/5/12 3:54 AM, jean bricmont wrote:
> I confess that I consider physics a more reliable science than marxism
> (one of my many petit bourgeois defects).
> But that is besides the point. You haven't read my piece. I don't stand
> up for Khartoum nor do you stand up for bus drivers in Tehran, because
> neither even knows that you and I exist
> and if they did, they wouldn't care.
Of course they know that I exist. The Marxism list has a number of
members of the Iranian left as subscribers. They appreciate it when
people call attention to trade union struggles in their country even if
it inconveniences a government that is part of the "axis of good". The
revolutionary left in Iran might not get invited to give speeches at the
UN or Columbia University but then neither do I.
> The only effect (and I, with my petit bourgeois morality care about
> effects of actions, not about proletarian grandstanding, backed up by
> "marxist" analysis) of the anti-anti-war left which, whenever there is a
> human rights crisis somewhere (where the US chooses to intervene), jumps
> on the bandwagon and "denounces" the enemy, is to destroy any possible
> antiwar movement.
I obviously come from a different tradition than you. In the late 30s
Trotsky was accused of being "objectively" pro-Hitler (or worse) because
he called for the overthrow of Stalin's dictatorship by the Soviet
working class. As it turns out, the USSR lost millions of its citizens
during Operation Barbarossa because of Stalin's stupidity. In the final
analysis, the best guarantee of peace is socialist revolution.
More information about the Marxism