[Marxism] Schoolmarm grammar
Wythe Holt jr.
wholt at law.ua.edu
Mon Dec 31 05:25:14 MST 2012
What is the difference, in pronunciation or meaning, between "shit" and "shite" (the latter of which is apparently not in use in the US)?
From: marxism-bounces+wholt=law.ua.edu at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu on behalf of Einde O'Callaghan
Sent: Mon 12/31/2012 1:42 AM
To: Wythe Holt jr.
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Schoolmarm grammar
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
On 31.12.2012 02:43, Ian Angus wrote:
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> Michael Smith <mjs <at> smithbowen.net> writes:
>> I never heard any other preterite for 'shit' than 'shat', which is
>> good Anglo-Saxon. Are there really people who say 'shitted'? Why,
>> for Grimm's sake?
> Living in North America, I've never heard "shat" except as a joke.
> And I've never heard "shitted" at all.
> In my experience (not, I realize, always the best guide)
> the commonly used preterite of "shit" is "shit."
> Similar to "hit."
> I shit today.
> I shit yesterday.
In Ireland the most common form of the infinitive is "to shite" although
probably more common is "to have a shite" - the past tense being "had a
While in London I seem to recall that the most common verb was "to have
a shit". My only encounter with "shat" in either country was in the
passive structure "he got shat upon from a great height!", meaning that
he got a really raw deal or was treated very badly - the use of the more
archaic "upon" would indicate that it's a idiomatic expression, perhaps
having humorous origins.
Incidentally I've always found "Shit!" a much more expressive expletive
than "Shite!" ;-)
Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/wholt%40law.ua.edu
More information about the Marxism