[Marxism] Why I am leaving Goldman-Sachs

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Mar 14 06:33:52 MDT 2012


(Not an indictment of capitalism to the slightest degree, but noteworthy 
nonetheless.)

NY Times Op-Ed March 14, 2012
Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs
By GREG SMITH

TODAY is my last day at Goldman Sachs. After almost 12 years at the firm 
— first as a summer intern while at Stanford, then in New York for 10 
years, and now in London — I believe I have worked here long enough to 
understand the trajectory of its culture, its people and its identity. 
And I can honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and 
destructive as I have ever seen it.

To put the problem in the simplest terms, the interests of the client 
continue to be sidelined in the way the firm operates and thinks about 
making money. Goldman Sachs is one of the world’s largest and most 
important investment banks and it is too integral to global finance to 
continue to act this way. The firm has veered so far from the place I 
joined right out of college that I can no longer in good conscience say 
that I identify with what it stands for.

It might sound surprising to a skeptical public, but culture was always 
a vital part of Goldman Sachs’s success. It revolved around teamwork, 
integrity, a spirit of humility, and always doing right by our clients. 
The culture was the secret sauce that made this place great and allowed 
us to earn our clients’ trust for 143 years. It wasn’t just about making 
money; this alone will not sustain a firm for so long. It had something 
to do with pride and belief in the organization. I am sad to say that I 
look around today and see virtually no trace of the culture that made me 
love working for this firm for many years. I no longer have the pride, 
or the belief.

But this was not always the case. For more than a decade I recruited and 
mentored candidates through our grueling interview process. I was 
selected as one of 10 people (out of a firm of more than 30,000) to 
appear on our recruiting video, which is played on every college campus 
we visit around the world. In 2006 I managed the summer intern program 
in sales and trading in New York for the 80 college students who made 
the cut, out of the thousands who applied.

I knew it was time to leave when I realized I could no longer look 
students in the eye and tell them what a great place this was to work.

When the history books are written about Goldman Sachs, they may reflect 
that the current chief executive officer, Lloyd C. Blankfein, and the 
president, Gary D. Cohn, lost hold of the firm’s culture on their watch. 
I truly believe that this decline in the firm’s moral fiber represents 
the single most serious threat to its long-run survival.

Over the course of my career I have had the privilege of advising two of 
the largest hedge funds on the planet, five of the largest asset 
managers in the United States, and three of the most prominent sovereign 
wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia. My clients have a total asset 
base of more than a trillion dollars. I have always taken a lot of pride 
in advising my clients to do what I believe is right for them, even if 
it means less money for the firm. This view is becoming increasingly 
unpopular at Goldman Sachs. Another sign that it was time to leave.

How did we get here? The firm changed the way it thought about 
leadership. Leadership used to be about ideas, setting an example and 
doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and 
are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position 
of influence.

What are three quick ways to become a leader? a) Execute on the firm’s 
“axes,” which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to invest in 
the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because 
they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit. b) “Hunt 
Elephants.” In English: get your clients — some of whom are 
sophisticated, and some of whom aren’t — to trade whatever will bring 
the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like 
selling my clients a product that is wrong for them. c) Find yourself 
sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque 
product with a three-letter acronym.

Today, many of these leaders display a Goldman Sachs culture quotient of 
exactly zero percent. I attend derivatives sales meetings where not one 
single minute is spent asking questions about how we can help clients. 
It’s purely about how we can make the most possible money off of them. 
If you were an alien from Mars and sat in on one of these meetings, you 
would believe that a client’s success or progress was not part of the 
thought process at all.

It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients 
off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing 
directors refer to their own clients as “muppets,” sometimes over 
internal e-mail. Even after the S.E.C., Fabulous Fab, Abacus, God’s 
work, Carl Levin, Vampire Squids? No humility? I mean, come on. 
Integrity? It is eroding. I don’t know of any illegal behavior, but will 
people push the envelope and pitch lucrative and complicated products to 
clients even if they are not the simplest investments or the ones most 
directly aligned with the client’s goals? Absolutely. Every day, in fact.

It astounds me how little senior management gets a basic truth: If 
clients don’t trust you they will eventually stop doing business with 
you. It doesn’t matter how smart you are.

These days, the most common question I get from junior analysts about 
derivatives is, “How much money did we make off the client?” It bothers 
me every time I hear it, because it is a clear reflection of what they 
are observing from their leaders about the way they should behave. Now 
project 10 years into the future: You don’t have to be a rocket 
scientist to figure out that the junior analyst sitting quietly in the 
corner of the room hearing about “muppets,” “ripping eyeballs out” and 
“getting paid” doesn’t exactly turn into a model citizen.

When I was a first-year analyst I didn’t know where the bathroom was, or 
how to tie my shoelaces. I was taught to be concerned with learning the 
ropes, finding out what a derivative was, understanding finance, getting 
to know our clients and what motivated them, learning how they defined 
success and what we could do to help them get there.

My proudest moments in life — getting a full scholarship to go from 
South Africa to Stanford University, being selected as a Rhodes Scholar 
national finalist, winning a bronze medal for table tennis at the 
Maccabiah Games in Israel, known as the Jewish Olympics — have all come 
through hard work, with no shortcuts. Goldman Sachs today has become too 
much about shortcuts and not enough about achievement. It just doesn’t 
feel right to me anymore.

I hope this can be a wake-up call to the board of directors. Make the 
client the focal point of your business again. Without clients you will 
not make money. In fact, you will not exist. Weed out the morally 
bankrupt people, no matter how much money they make for the firm. And 
get the culture right again, so people want to work here for the right 
reasons. People who care only about making money will not sustain this 
firm — or the trust of its clients — for very much longer.

Greg Smith is resigning today as a Goldman Sachs executive director and 
head of the firm’s United States equity derivatives business in Europe, 
the Middle East and Africa.




More information about the Marxism mailing list