[Marxism] Ian BIrchall bashes Paul Levi

Lenin's Tomb leninstombblog at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 11 10:54:19 MDT 2013


Well, the context is that Ian supported the IDOOP faction, while John Rose supported the leadership faction.  You're right to see this as being related, it seems to me; there are a few Aesopian references here.  But it's not a defence of orthodoxy.



On 11 Apr 2013, at 12:43, Louis Proyect <lnp3 at panix.com> wrote:

> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
> 
> 
> On 4/11/13 12:33 PM, Lenin's Tomb wrote:
>>> This, of course, goes hand in hand with Alex Callinicos's defense of Leninist "orthodoxy".
>>> 
>>> http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=891&issue=138#138birchall_1
>>> 
>> 
>> Er, not it doesn't.
> 
> I see that Birchall's article is a reply to John Rose who identifies with Levi:
> 
> http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=886&issue=138
> 
> In any case, these are interesting questions that deserve further commentary. I will try to say something when I get a chance.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/leninstombblog%40googlemail.com




More information about the Marxism mailing list