[Marxism] Why the US military should make the AK-47 its standard

Clay Claiborne clayclai at gmail.com
Mon Dec 23 22:59:14 MST 2013

Personally I prefer the .50 BMG, mainly because I like the idea of being
able to kill some one while they are still more than a mile away from me.

Seriously, on the AK-47 vs M-16 debate, I would say that while there is a
lot of sloppy AK-47 junk around that was cheaply produced, and the fact
that it can be cheaply produce and still be effective is one of its charms
and one that makes it more of a proletariat weapon, the AK-47 architecture,
if you will, is still superior, to these designs and their have been many
variation on the AK-47 theme in the last 65 years including new ones that
are very precise and extremely well made.

>From Wikipedia:

The AKM, with the 7.62×39mm cartridge, has a battle range of around 350
> metres (1,150 ft).[7]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47#cite_note-izhmash-9>The best shooters are able to hit a man-sized target at 800 metres with
> five shots (firing from prone position or a trench) or ten shots (standing).
> [59]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47#cite_note-FOOTNOTE.D0.9D.D0.A1.D0.94._7.2C62-.D0.BC.D0.BC_.D0.B0.D0.B2.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.B0.D1.82_.D0.90.D0.9A.D0.9C_.28.D0.90.D0.9A.D0.9C.D0.A1.291983155-62>

Which is good enough consider it is more likely to perform as advertised.

Clay Claiborne, Director
Vietnam: American Holocaust <http://VietnamAmericanHolocaust.com>
Linux Beach Productions
Venice, CA 90291
(310) 581-1536

Read my blogs at the Linux Beach <http://claysbeach.blogspot.com/>

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:33 PM, DW <dwaltersmia at gmail.com> wrote:

> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
> I suspect Clay was being sarcastic (right Clay? RIGHT??!!!)
> There is no consensus really on this question. The fact is that the modern
> day M-16/M-4 is a likely built *better* than the AK-47. The reason the
> AK-47 was adopted had simply to do with one thing: it is cheap to produce.
> The overly US funded Egyptian Military produces their own AK-47 called the
> "AKM". Everything else is U.S. Taxpayer dollar paid for U.S. manufactured
> hardware...except the AKM. One the main reasons, too, for the lack of a US
> AK-47 military rifle is this: it one of the least accurate weapons of it's
> kind out there. The damn thing actually rattles! Generally the M-16s are
> more accurate. Lastly, the AK round weights in heavier making carrying more
> rounds harder. Of course you can make AKs chambered for the M-16 round
> (.223).
> The U.S. military has several other weapons already chambered for their
> machine guns with the .223 round sound switch over would be a pain for the
> Pentagon. As it happens they are planning to switch to a bigger round
> anyway in the next decade but they will do what they have to in order never
> to pay the Russians the rights to produce an AK. It's just not happening.
> If anyone ever has the chance to shoot one of these off, I highly recommend
> you take advantage of it and do so.
> David
> ________________________________________________
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
> http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/clayclai%40gmail.com

More information about the Marxism mailing list