[Marxism] question re barrel bombs

Andrew Pollack acpollack2 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 24 10:08:43 MST 2013


Thanks, that article is very useful in understanding the technology.

Meanwhile here's a brand new article which focuses more on why the regime
might be using barrel bombs, and whether that's instead of in addition to
conventional bombs:

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2013/Dec-24/242165-regimes-latest-weapon-simple-but-deadly.ashx#axzz2oPedP32U

The article, like most I found by googling, quotes Brown Moses extensively.
Good work!


On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Louis Proyect <lnp3 at panix.com> wrote:

> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
> On 12/24/13 9:49 AM, Andrew Pollack wrote:
>
>> But here's my question: if you have room in your plane for such weapons,
>> and your goal is just to kill anything in a given wide area, what's the
>> advantage of such low-tech bombs? Why not two or three of the standard
>> higher firepower bombs instead of a dozen smaller ones?
>>
>
> Actually MIG's are not set up for such devices, only helicopters from
> which they are dropped at a height too great to ensure any kind of
> accuracy. It seems that rebels--probably those with good connections in
> Saudi Arabia--have now got their hands on some MANPAD's. That is why there
> is so much "collateral damage" as if al-Assad really cared.
>
> The topic is examined in great deal at Brown Moses (surprise, surprise):
>
> http://brown-moses.blogspot.com/2013/12/syrias-barrel-
> bomb-technology-relative.html
>
> ________________________________________________
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/
> marxism/acpollack2%40gmail.com
>



More information about the Marxism mailing list