[Marxism] Aaron Swartz, Precocious Programmer and Internet Activist, Dies at 26

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Sat Jan 12 13:42:12 MST 2013


NY Times January 12, 2013
Aaron Swartz, Precocious Programmer and Internet Activist, Dies at 26
By JOHN SCHWARTZ

Aaron Swartz, a wizardly programmer who as a teenager helped develop 
code that delivered ever-changing Web content to users and later became 
a steadfast crusader to make that information freely available, was 
found dead on Friday in his New York apartment.

He was 26.

An uncle, Michael Wolf, said that Mr. Swartz had apparently hanged 
himself, and that Mr. Swartz’s girlfriend had discovered the body.

At 14, Mr. Swartz helped create RSS, the nearly ubiquitous tool that 
allows users to subscribe to online information. He later became an 
Internet folk hero, pushing to make many Web files free and open to the 
public. But in July 2011, he was indicted on federal charges of gaining 
illegal access to JSTOR, a subscription-only service for distributing 
scientific and literary journals, and downloading 4.8 million articles 
and documents, nearly the entire library.

Charges in the case, including wire fraud and computer fraud, were 
pending at the time of Mr. Swartz’s death, carrying potential penalties 
of up to 35 years in prison and $1 million in fines.

“Aaron built surprising new things that changed the flow of information 
around the world,” said Susan Crawford, a professor at the Cardozo 
School of Law in New York who served in the Obama administration as a 
technology adviser. She called Mr. Swartz “a complicated prodigy” and 
said “graybeards approached him with awe.”

Mr. Wolf said he would remember his nephew as a young man who “looked at 
the world, and had a certain logic in his brain, and the world didn’t 
necessarily fit in with that logic, and that was sometimes difficult.”

The Tech, a newspaper of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 
reported Mr. Swartz’s death early Saturday.

Mr. Swartz led an often itinerant life that included dropping out of 
Stanford, forming companies and organizations, and becoming a fellow at 
Harvard University’s Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics.

He formed a company that merged with Reddit, the popular news and 
information site. He also co-founded Demand Progress, a group that 
promotes online campaigns on social justice issues — including a 
successful effort, with other groups, to oppose a Hollywood-backed 
Internet piracy bill.

But he also found trouble when he took part in efforts to release 
information to the public that he felt should be freely available. In 
2008, he took on PACER, or Public Access to Court Electronic Records, 
the repository for federal judicial documents.

The database charges 10 cents a page for documents; activists like Carl 
Malamud, the founder of public.resource.org, have long argued that such 
documents should be free because they are produced at public expense. 
Joining Mr. Malamud’s efforts to make the documents public by posting 
legally obtained files to the Internet for free access, Mr. Swartz wrote 
an elegant little program to download 20 million pages of documents from 
free library accounts, or roughly 20 percent of the enormous database.

  The government abruptly shut down the free library program, and Mr. 
Malamud feared that legal trouble might follow even though he felt they 
had violated no laws. As he recalled in a newspaper account of the 
events, “I immediately saw the potential for overreaction by the 
courts.” He recalled telling Mr. Swartz: “You need to talk to a lawyer. 
I need to talk to a lawyer.”

Mr. Swartz recalled in a 2009 interview, “I had this vision of the feds 
crashing down the door, taking everything away.” He said he locked the 
deadbolt on his door, lay down on the bed for a while and then called 
his mother.

When an article about his Pacer exploit was published in The New York 
Times, Mr. Swartz responded in a blog post in a typically puckish 
manner, announcing the story in the form of a personal ad: “Attention 
attractive people: Are you looking for someone respectable enough that 
they’ve been personally vetted by The New York Times, but has enough of 
a bad-boy streak that the vetting was because they ‘liberated’ millions 
of dollars of government documents? If so, look no further than page A14 
of today’s New York Times.

The federal government investigated but decided not to prosecute.

In 2011, however, Mr. Swartz went beyond that, according to a federal 
indictment. In an effort to provide free public access to JSTOR, he 
broke into computer networks at M.I.T. by means that included gaining 
entry to a utility closet on campus and leaving a laptop that signed 
into the university network under a false account, federal officials said.

Mr. Swartz turned over his hard drives with 4.8 million documents, and 
JSTOR declined to pursue the case. But Carmen M. Ortiz, a United States 
attorney, pressed on, saying that “stealing is stealing, whether you use 
a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or 
dollars.”

Mr. Malamud said that while he did not approve of Mr. Swartz’s actions 
at M.I.T., “access to knowledge and access to justice have become all 
about access to money, and Aaron tried to change that. That should never 
have been considered a criminal activity.”

  Cory Doctorow, a science fiction author and online activist, posted a 
tribute to Mr. Swartz on BoingBoing.net, a blog he co-edits. In an 
e-mail, he called Mr. Swartz “uncompromising, principled, smart, flawed, 
loving, caring, and brilliant.”

“The world was a better place with him in it,” he said.

Of the indictment, he said, “The fact that the U.S. legal apparatus 
decided he belonged behind bars for downloading scholarly articles 
without permission is as neat an indictment of our age — and validation 
of his struggle — as you could ask for.”

Mr. Swartz, he noted, had a habit of turning on those closest to him, 
saying that “Aaron held the world, his friends, and his mentors to an 
impossibly high standard — the same standard he set for himself.” He 
added, however, “It’s a testament to his friendship that no one ever 
seemed to hold it against him (except, maybe, himself).”

In 2007, Mr. Swartz wrote about his struggle with depression, 
distinguishing it from the emotion of sadness. “Go outside and get some 
fresh air or cuddle with a loved one and you don’t feel any better, only 
more upset at being unable to feel the joy that everyone else seems to 
feel. Everything gets colored by the sadness.” When the condition gets 
worse, he wrote, “you feel as if streaks of pain are running through 
your head, you thrash your body, you search for some escape but find 
none. And this is one of the more moderate forms.” Earlier that year, he 
gave a talk in which he described having had suicidal thoughts during a 
low period in his career.

On Wednesday JSTOR announced that it would open its archives for 1,200 
journals to free reading by the public on a limited basis.

Lawrence Lessig, who heads the Safra Center at Harvard and had worked 
for a time on behalf of Mr. Swartz’s legal defense, noted in an 
interview that Mr. Swartz had been arrested by the M.I.T. campus police 
two years to the day before his suicide. That arrest led to the eventual 
federal indictment and financial ruin for Mr. Swartz, who had made money 
on the sale of Reddit to Condé Nast but had never tried to turn his 
intellect to making money. “I can just imagine him thinking it was going 
to be a million-dollar defense,” Mr. Lessig said. “He didn’t have a 
million dollars.”

In an online broadside directed at prosecutors, Mr. Lessig denounced 
what he called the federal “bullying,” and wrote, “this government needs 
to answer is why it was so necessary that Aaron Swartz be labeled a “felon.”

Still, Mr. Lessig said, he had seen Mr. Swartz just weeks before, at a 
Christmas party at his home, and before that, at Thanksgiving. “He 
seemed fine,” he said.

Ravi Somaiya contributed reporting.




More information about the Marxism mailing list