[Marxism] Re Rings a bell

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Jan 16 12:54:00 MST 2013


On 1/16/13 2:45 PM, En Passant with John Passant wrote:
> Not necessarily. I'd argue maybe it is what you get when the
> leadership doesn't understand democratic centralism and the absolute
> necessity for democracy in the organisation. Of course understanding
> it doesn't make it so but that is another question.

John, eventually I might get around to commenting on the evolution of 
Socialist Alternative--much of which I find encouraging--but in my view 
the vigorous application of party-building concepts laid out by Mick 
Armstrong in "From Little Things Big Things Grow" would have led to a 
dead-end. I strongly suspect that the SAlt comrades no longer adhere to 
these principles but need to review the literature. My hope for the 
future is a Syriza type formation in Australia that can express the 
diversity of the revolutionary left. If the comrades can play a role in 
catalyzing such a formation, they deserve a Red Medal. In any case, the 
sooner we put terms like "democratic centralism" to rest, the better.




More information about the Marxism mailing list