[Marxism] Assad's backers on the left are ignoring reality
schonbrun at gmail.com
Wed May 8 23:01:42 MDT 2013
Two Thoughts on Syria.
1. The media coverage of Syria is strikingly similar to coverage of Iraq
before our “leaders” invaded that country, similar to Chile before the CIA
sponsored the coup and murder of Allende, similar to Panama before we
bombed them, ditto Libya, and I could name many more. In those cases,
there was an intense zeroing in on “human rights” violations. That focus
was a precursor to US aggression. How is this different?
2. Why do we save characterizations like “bloodthirsty” for leaders of
other countries, when our leaders have shed more blood than all others
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Michael Karadjis <mkaradjis at gmail.com>wrote:
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: Shane Mage
>> >Assad's Western defenders either don't mention Israel at all when >they
>> list the countries they think are waging "war on Syria" (and >hope no-one
>> notices the omission); or, even worse, they add Israel to >their list
>> despite the evidence (and hope no-one notices).
>> A very odd reaction to the Israeli aggressions! It could be said
>> accurately the Israel is waging war
> directly, the West economically, the Arab dictatorships by proxy as well
> as ideologically. None of which, of course, justifies a smidgen of support
> for Assad!
> If you mean actual war on Syria, then exactly, Israel is the only state
> that has actually waged war, with these latest bombings, and in any case
> with the 46 year occupation sovereign Syrian territory in the Golan, it is
> in a state of war.
> But the post was not talking about war on Syria, but about the "war on
> Syria," ie, leftist code for the 99% indigenous Syrian uprising (quite
> separate is the issue of the proportion of this uprising that is still
> democratic v the proportion that is reactionary-sectarian). It is code for
> support for Assad's bloodthirsty repression. Pro-Assad leftists usually
> list Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, the US and other imperialist powers. My
> contention is that to the extent to which it is true - ie actual arming of
> the reactionary-sectarian elements - it only concerns those first three
> countries, not the US.
> Above all it does not include Israel, which, notwithstanding its actual
> acts of war on Syria as a country and the Syrian people, has a distinct
> preference for the Assad regime over the popular opposition in the war
> going on.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.**utah.edu<Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu>
> Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.**
More information about the Marxism