[Marxism] Not the typical jock

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Sat May 11 06:23:24 MDT 2013

NY Times May 10, 2013
George Sauer, Jets Receiver and Rebel, Is Dead at 69

George Sauer, who as a wide receiver for the Jets played a pivotal role 
in the team’s stunning victory in Super Bowl III, and who later quit 
professional football because he considered it dehumanizing, died on 
Tuesday in Westerville, Ohio. He was 69.

His sister, Dana Keifer, confirmed the death, saying the cause was 
congestive heart failure. She said he had been struggling with 
Alzheimer’s disease for some time.

The Baltimore Colts were three-touchdown favorites when they faced the 
Jets in the 1969 Super Bowl, in Miami, but they lost, 16-7, in one of 
the great upsets in pro football history. A big factor was the stellar 
play of Jets quarterback Joe Namath, who had brashly guaranteed a 
victory. Sauer was another.

The Jets were not only underdogs to a powerful Baltimore team, but they 
were also hobbled when Don Maynard, their speedy flanker and favorite 
Namath target, pulled a hamstring muscle. Maynard caught no passes that 
day. But Sauer, a split end who lacked great speed but ran textbook pass 
patterns, caught eight.

Sauer was a four-time All-Star in the American Football League. He 
played for the Jets in the A.F.L. and then the N.F.L. from 1965 through 
1970, appearing in 84 games and catching 309 passes for 4,965 yards and 
28 touchdowns.

He retired from the N.F.L. at the end of the 1970 season at 27, at the 
peak of his career (though he would return briefly to the game with 
short-lived rival leagues).

He had grown to hate the life of a pro football player, he said.

“When you get to the college and professional levels, the coaches still 
treat you as an adolescent,” he said in an interview in 1971 with the 
Institute for the Study of Sport and Society. “They know damn well that 
you were never given a chance to become responsible or self-disciplined. 
Even in the pros, you were told when to go to bed, when to turn your 
lights off, when to wake up, when to eat and what to eat. You even have 
to live and eat together like you were in a boys’ camp.”

Ten years later, he remained just as disillusioned. In an interview with 
The New York Times, he called professional football “a grotesque 
business” designed to “mold you into someone easy to manipulate.”

His attitude did not surprise his father, George H. Sauer Sr., a former 
college coach and later a pro football executive. “He definitely does 
not like to be regimented,” he said of his son.

George Henry Sauer Jr. was born to George and Lillian Sauer on Nov. 10, 
1943, in Sheboygan, Wis., and raised in Waco, Tex. At 6 feet 2 inches 
and 195 pounds, he was an outstanding receiver at the University of 
Texas, where he gave up premedical studies because he did not have time 
for both that and football. He was a member of Texas teams that went 
undefeated in 1963-64, winning the Cotton Bowl, and that defeated 
Alabama in the 1965 Orange Bowl.

He skipped his last year of college eligibility and signed with the 
Jets, where his father was the player personnel director.

Sauer was married and divorced several times. His sister, Ms. Keifer, is 
his only immediate survivor.

After leaving the Jets, Sauer played for the New York Stars and the 
Charlotte Hornets of the short-lived World Football League in 1974. In 
1979, he was an assistant coach with the Carolina Chargers of the 
American Football Association.

He also furthered an interest in writing, turning out novels, poetry and 
book reviews.

“He didn’t want to be anything but a poet and a writer,” John Dockery, a 
former Jets teammate and roommate during road games, recalled in a 2008 
interview, “but he was given skills he didn’t want. He wanted something 
else. He walked away from the money, from everything, because it was too 
painful for him.”

Sauer expressed his misgivings about the football life in an article in 
The Times in 1983.

“My passion for the game was not sufficient,” he wrote. “Football is an 
ambiguous sport, depending both on grace and violence. It both glorifies 
and destroys bodies. At the time, I could not reconcile the apparent 
inconsistency. I care even less about being a public person. You stick 
out too much, the world enlarges around you to dangerous proportions, 
and you are too evident to too many others. There is a vulnerability in 
this and, oddly enough, some guilt involved in standing out.”

Daniel E. Slotnik contributed reporting.

More information about the Marxism mailing list