[Marxism] Counterpunch at a new sexist low, still digging

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Fri May 17 10:10:19 MDT 2013


On 5/17/13 12:02 PM, Dan R wrote:
> While I happen to lean in your direction on the SWP 'boycott' question, I'm
> a bit surprised you'd like a party leadership to be able to control its
> members actions in that manner.
>
> And in case you've forgotten, the ISO has publicly spoken out against the
> SWP leadership - none of whom will be speaking at our conference this year.
> A number of oppositionists - both inside and outside of the party - will be.

Who knows why Paul Le Blanc is dignifying this slimy gathering. Maybe 
the prospect of speaking from a podium is a drug more powerful than 
Oxycontin. But what does this say about the grasp of "socialism from 
below" and all that other sanctimonious jive when your main theoretician 
on how to create a blemish-free revolutionary party is going to lend his 
name to a group that has just run a kangaroo court to help a top leader 
avoid the consequences of the most brutal crime short of murder. And 
then when leading members of the party organize a faction to set things 
right, they meet bureaucratic obstacles as bad as any I ever saw in the 
American group with the same name.

Hypocrisy reigns supreme.





More information about the Marxism mailing list