[Marxism] bluff, bluster, and bullshit at CounterPunch
dmozart1756 at gmail.com
Sun May 26 15:09:38 MDT 2013
Mark Lause writes -
. . . and our priroities now equate rape and an article that uses "tits"?
Again and again, the issue is NOT the use of that word, but the essence of
the original article as well as the cavalier and condescending reply by the
CP editors. It's sad that some old white guys on this list, people that
I respect and agree with on most issues, just don't get it when it comes to
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Louis Proyect <lnp3 at panix.com> wrote:
Well, ISO kiddies--with your Ivy League pedigrees--that's the kind of woman
Ruth Fowler is. Get used to it. It's a wide world out there that does not
fit into your understanding of feminism.
> Love the class baiting approach, coming as it does from a prole like L.
> Proyect. Have you forgotten how it felt to be on the receiving end of that
> demagogy when you were put down as a petty-bourgeois for coming to SWP
> meetings in a suit?
More information about the Marxism