[Marxism] C.S. Lewis gets fucked again
gary.maclennan1 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 23 01:50:44 MST 2013
I did recently pen a short piece about fantasy in a review of China
Mieville's Kraken. In that piece I tried to make the case that Tolkien was
not as reactionary as he is depicted. As usual on this list, my post sank
Sigh! Why do I bother?
Still I think that it is arguable and if I get time I will argue it - that
Tolkien is an ambivalent figure. Of course he praises the feudal nobility,
but the true heroes of his sagas are the peasantry, the little people i.e.
the Hobbits. This is pure Rousseau. Of course it is not Marxist, but then
in my old age I am inclined to think the unthinkable that Rousseau maybe,
just maybe,was more radical than Marx!
I have not read Narnia and have only watched bits and pieces on the tele,
but I do take Lewis seriously as a thinker and again, when I get the time I
might finally read his treatise on love.
In any case, you are correct, he is a much more considerable figure than
Jack (This will only take a minute!) Kennedy.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Andrew Pollack <acpollack2 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> As his biographer A.N. Wilson notes, Lewis's death on this day 50 years ago
> got pushed aside in the news by other events.
> From what I can see so far, the same is happening on this anniversary.
> Lewis of course was a die-hard reactionary, like his friend Tolkien. But
> IMO he's an essential read, both fiction and nonfiction. (I've read his
> Narnia Chronicles 4 or 5 times, the last two in tandem, for comparative
> purposes, with Philip Pullman's "His Dark Materials.")
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
More information about the Marxism