[Marxism] Fwd: [change-links] Kissinger saw the benefits of Syrian intervention in Lebanon

Clay Claiborne clayclai at gmail.com
Sat Sep 28 14:58:04 MDT 2013

good quote

 *"They are also striking because they show the relatively close
relationship between the Assad regime and the U.S."*

I cover the relation in depth in the Obama Admin in:

This is good on background.

*Barack Obama's Courtship of Bashar

Date: Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM
Subject: [change-links] Kissinger saw the benefits of Syrian intervention
in Lebanon
To: Venezuela_Today <Venezuela_Today at yahoogroups.com>, csny <
CubaSolidarityNY at yahoogroups.com>


Kissinger saw the benefits of Syrian intervention in Lebanon
September 23, 2013 12:24 AMBy Kareem
Shaheen<http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Kareem-Shaheen.ashx> The
Daily Star [image: Kissinger uses a map of Beirut as he briefs the House
International Relations Committee in Washington on June 17, 1976.] Kissinger
uses a map of Beirut as he briefs the House International Relations
Committee in Washington on June 17, 1976. [image: A+] [image: A-]

BEIRUT: A new set of declassified documents on the run-up to the Syrian
intervention in Lebanon’s Civil War sheds light on American diplomacy
during the crisis, including contacts with late President Hafez Assad’s
regime and U.S. hopes that a Syrian intervention would weaken Yasser
Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organization. The documents, minutes of
meetings involving U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, reveal the top
U.S. diplomat’s open contempt and frustration toward Israeli policymakers
for threatening to invade south Lebanon in response to a Syrian

“You know these Israelis really are shits,” Kissinger said at a meeting in
March 1976, expressing anger at the possibility of an Israeli attack.

The archival documents show the U.S. administration had foreknowledge of a
possible Syrian intervention, deciding it was in accordance with U.S.
interests but refraining from supporting it publicly in fear of the
invasion sparking a broad Middle Eastern war.

“Now if I could design the solution, I would go to Assad and say, ‘If you
could move in quickly, and if you could give us an iron clad guarantee that
you will get out again quickly and that you will not go south of the
[Litani] river, we will keep the Israelis out,’” he said in one meeting.

The minutes show a Kissinger deeply involved in Middle Eastern politics,
conferring on an almost daily basis with top advisers and closely following
Lebanon’s descent into violence while trying to grapple with the
insurmountable complexity of its civil war politics.

Kissinger saw benefits to a Syrian intervention, guessing that it would
weaken Arafat’s PLO, but he refrained from backing it publicly and in talks
with Syrian officials.

The documents paint an image of an irreverent, sharp and sometimes profane
man, who was also prone to generalizations, for instance describing
Egyptian negotiators as “duplicitous.”

They are also striking because they show the relatively close relationship
between the Assad regime and the U.S.

The documents are part of a multi-volume series called “Foreign Relations
of the United States.” The volume dealing with the Arab-Israeli dispute
includes a set of archival files on meetings concerning Lebanon at the
start of the Civil War.

American officials had a low opinion of Lebanese politicians at the time.
Former President Suleiman Franjieh is described as “a disaster,” Druze
leader Kamal Jumblatt as “crazy” and political leaders as “warlords.”

Syrian intervention in Lebanon was discussed in a meeting on Oct. 13,
immediately sparking talk of a likely Israeli retaliation.

“There is no way – no way – in which the Israelis will sit still while the
Syrians send in their troops. I am sure of that,” said Kissinger, who
sought to find out from the Israelis what level of Syrian activity in
Lebanon would be acceptable to them.

Kissinger was also dismissive of the Israeli government, describing former
General and premier Yigal Allon as a “sweet fool” and Yitzhak Rabin as
“weak,” while lamenting the U.S. failure to influence its ally.

The secretary said he was ready to support Syrian efforts to achieve a
political solution in Lebanon.

“We have to go back to Assad ... Ask him what he is up to and, if we agree
with him, we will do our best to help him,” he said. “But warn him what he
does must be done without the use of Syrian regular forces.”

“Also have him give Assad my best personal regards,” he said to a
diplomatic envoy.

In March 1976, as the Americans gleaned more details of the extent of
Syria’s potential involvement, American officials sought clarity from
Syria over
its intentions in Lebanon and how long it would stay there.

Kissinger said the Israelis would intervene because they wished to strike a
mortal blow to PLO strongholds in Lebanon, which he referred derisively to
as “Fatahland.”

“Their position is that they cannot trust the Syrians,” Kissinger said.
“They are not at all sure that the Syrians would leave if they go in, so
that if they do go in, the Israelis would then quietly take over strategic
points in southern Lebanon and in effect hold them hostage till the Syrians

But in a meeting with President Gerald Ford in late March, Kissinger said
the U.S. might benefit from a Syrian intervention that strikes at the PLO.

“If Syria could go in quickly and clean it out, it would be good,” he said.

Kissinger floated the idea at the time that the Syrians could be replaced
by a U.N. force after destroying the PLO.

But Kissinger was frustrated by Israel’s objections, and decided it was not
worth the risk to greenlight a Syrian invasion of Lebanon if it risked
sparking a regional war.

“If we had freedom of action we could perhaps act differently,” he said.
“We could let the Syrians move and break the back of the PLO.”

Such an intervention would unite the Arab world, Kissinger lamented.

“The end result would be exactly what we have worked all these years to
avoid: It would create Arab unity.”

He decried what he called “those idiots in Tel Aviv,” saying Israel would
not acquiesce to U.S. pressure against invading south Lebanon unless
America threatened
to end military assistance and support sanctions in the U.N. against Israel.

Even after Syria’s intervention and the ensuing stalemate with the PLO,
Kissinger said Syrian failure in Lebanon would mean the country’s fall
under the sway of the PLO and the possible overthrow of Hafez Assad.

“I want to make it clear that a Syrian defeat in Lebanon would be a
disaster,” he said at a meeting in the summer of 1976.

But he also described Syrian ambitions in Lebanon in hegemonic terms,
agreeing that they sought “ancestral” ambitions. “I started with the
assumption the Syrians would succeed. I forgot the infinite capacity of the
Arabs to screw things up,” he said at a June 1976 meeting. “I thought
they’d weaken the PLO, make it an appendage of Syria, bring in Jordan, and
create a Greater Syria. I still think this is what [Assad] has in mind.”

Kissinger also excoriated the Israeli lobby in Washington for trying to
shape American foreign policy.

“The Israelis used to lobby for their own interests,” he said at a meeting
in August 1976. “Now they are lobbying to change the entire course of our
policy to coincide with their own policy rather than our interests.”

 A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star
on September 23, 2013, on page 3.

Read more:

(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb)

  Reply via web
to sender
<cort.greene at gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Kissinger%20saw%20the%20benefits%20of%20Syrian%20intervention%20in%20Lebanon>
to group
<change-links at yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Kissinger%20saw%20the%20benefits%20of%20Syrian%20intervention%20in%20Lebanon>
a New Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/change-links/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcGludDQyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzExMDA5MzMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzOTg1BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTM4MDM4OTk0MA-->
in this topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/change-links/message/116200;_ylc=X3oDMTM4NGppMzFzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzExMDA5MzMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzOTg1BG1zZ0lkAzExNjIwMARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzODAzODk5NDAEdHBjSWQDMTE2MjAw>(1)
Recent Activity:

 Visit Your Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/change-links;_ylc=X3oDMTJldnQ1YzZlBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzExMDA5MzMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzOTg1BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTM4MDM4OTk0MA-->
 Change Links Progressive Newspaper.
Act.  Act in Love and Spirit.
 [image: Yahoo!
Switch to: Text-Only<change-links-traditional at yahoogroups.com?subject=Change+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>,
Daily Digest<change-links-digest at yahoogroups.com?subject=Email+Delivery:+Digest>•
Unsubscribe <change-links-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>•
of Use <http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> • Send us
<ygroupsnotifications at yahoogroups.com?subject=Feedback+on+the+redesigned+individual+mail+v1>


More information about the Marxism mailing list