[Marxism] O'Donnell's good question and Obama's bad answer
acpollack2 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 22 15:27:43 MDT 2014
Various media have different lists of job types in Obama's remarks. The
official transcript says "farmers, teachers or pharmacists:
But that's not my main point. Below is my comment when a Syrian
revolutionary friend shared the article:
"The worst part about his speech is his slanderous denial of the ability of
"farmers or teachers or pharmacists" to defeat Assad. It is PRECISELY those
folks and the rest of Syria's working masses who alone can defeat Assad.
The problem is not the class composition of the FSA, but rather that of its
bourgeois leadership. (And one day the US working masses will overthrow the
filthy ruling class whom Obama gladly serves here.)
PS: I must say Obama clearly doesn't know shit about the Arab-American
community or he wouldn't have slandered pharmacists in particular."
This comment drew an impressive number of "likes" from other pro-Revolution
Arabs. (And of course they're spitting mad about Obama's callous remarks in
general, the essence of which is 'you Syrians are too low-class and stupid
to deserve our support, so fuck off.'"
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Clay Claiborne via Marxism <
marxism at lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> From Linux Beach:
> O'Donnell's good question and Obama's bad answer
> > "/CBS This Morning" /host Norah O'Donnell asked
> > <
> > President Obama a very good question when she interviewed him about
> > the growth of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham or ISIS and its
> > dramatic return to Iraq after a year of growth in Syria:
> > /Would that vacuum exist had we backed the moderate forces in Syria?/
> > President Barack Obama responded:
> > /"Yes, I think this notion that somehow there was this ready-made
> > moderate Syrian force that was able to defeat [Syrian President
> > Bashar] Assad is simply not true, and, you know, we have spent a
> > lot of time trying to work with a moderate opposition in Syria.
> > "But, as I said yesterday, when you get farmers, dentists and
> > folks who have never fought before going up against a ruthless
> > opposition in Assad, the notion that they were in a position to
> > suddenly overturn not only Assad but also ruthless, highly trained
> > jihadists if we just sent a few arms is a fantasy. And I think
> > it's very important for the American people - but maybe more
> > importantly, Washington and the press corps - to understand that."/
> > The correct answer is No, ISIS would probably not be leading the
> > uprising in Iraq if Obama had backed the moderate forces in Syria.
> > President Obama is just wrong when he implies that the Syrian
> > opposition had to battle both the Assad regime and the hard-line
> > Islamic jihadists from the beginning and he is wrong when he says his
> > administration did all it could to help them when it /"spent a lot of
> > time trying to work with"/ some of the opposition forces. The struggle
> > against Assad had gone on for almost a year before these jihadists
> > became a significant factor.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism at lists.csbs.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
More information about the Marxism