[Marxism] Claiming a Copyright on Marx? How Uncomradely

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Thu May 1 00:59:06 MDT 2014

NY Times, May 1 2014 (How appropriate)
Claiming a Copyright on Marx? How Uncomradely

The Marxist Internet Archive, a website devoted to radical writers and 
thinkers, recently received an email: It must take down hundreds of 
works by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels or face legal consequences.

The warning didn’t come from a multinational media conglomerate but from 
a small, leftist publisher, Lawrence & Wishart, which asserted copyright 
ownership over the 50-volume, English-language edition of Marx’s and 
Engels’s writings.

To some, it was “uncomradely” that fellow radicals would deploy the 
capitalist tool of intellectual property law to keep Marx’s and Engels’s 
writings off the Internet. And it wasn’t lost on the archive’s 
supporters that the deadline for complying with the order came on the 
eve of May 1, International Workers’ Day.

“Marx and Engels belong to the working class of the world spiritually, 
they are that important,” said David Walters, one of the organizers of 
the Marxist archive. “I would think Marx would want the most prolific 
and free distribution of his ideas possible — he wasn’t in it for the 

Still, Mr. Walters said the archive respected the publisher’s copyright, 
which covers the translated works, not the German originals from the 
19th century. On Wednesday, the archive removed the disputed writings 
with a note blaming the publisher and a bold headline: “File No Longer 

The fight over online control of Marx’s works comes at a historical 
moment when his ideas have found a new relevance, whether because the 
financial crisis of 2008 shook people’s confidence in global capitalism 
or, with the passage of time, the Marx name has become less shackled to 
the legacy of the Soviet Union. The unlikely best seller by the French 
economist Thomas Piketty, “Capital in the 21st Century,” harks back to 
Marx’s work, examining historical trends toward inequality in wealth.

Despite this boomlet in interest, however, Lawrence & Wishart, located 
in East London, hardly expects to have an online hit on its hands, said 
Sally Davison, the publisher’s managing editor. The goal is to create a 
digital edition to sell to libraries in place of a print edition, which 
costs roughly $1,500 for the 50 volumes.

“Creating a digital strategy is key to our survival,” she said. “We are 
currently negotiating with somebody, that’s why we’ve asked the archive 
to take it off; it’s hard to sell it to librarians if a version already 
exists online.”

Lawrence & Wishart has been losing the argument online, however. The 
publisher said that it had received about 500 irate emails, along the 
lines of “How can you say you are radicals?” There are more than 4,500 
signatures on an online petition to oppose the notion of a copyright 
claim on Marx’s and Engels’s writings; the petition cites the 
incongruity, noting that the two philosophers “wrote against the 
monopoly of capitalism and its origin, private property, all their 
lives.” And the libertarian Cato Institute enjoyed teasing its 
ideological adversaries with an I-told-you-so blog post titled, “Because 
Property Rights Are Important.”

Ms. Davison said she was flabbergasted to see Lawrence & Wishart cast as 
the oppressor. The publisher has two full-time employees and two 
part-time employees and barely makes ends meet, publishing a handful of 
journals, like Anarchy Studies, and about a dozen left-wing books a 
year, she said.

“We make no profit and are not particularly well paid,” she said.

Ms. Davison defended her position by quoting Marx to the effect that you 
must adapt to real-world conditions: “We don’t live in a world of 
everybody sharing everything. As Marx said, and I may be paraphrasing, 
‘We make our own history, but not in the conditions of our own choosing.’ ”

The publisher also tried to turn the tables on its critics, questioning 
whether it was indeed radical to believe that there is no ownership of 
content produced through hard work, like the mammoth translation and 
annotation of Marx’s and Engels’s work, a project initially directed by 
the Soviet Union in the late 1960s that took some 30 years of 
collaboration among scholars across the world.

In a note on its site, Lawrence & Wishart said its critics were not 
carrying on the socialist and communist traditions, but reflecting a 
“consumer culture which expects cultural content to be delivered free to 
consumers, leaving cultural workers such as publishers, editors and 
writers unpaid, while the large publishing and other media conglomerates 
and aggregators continue to enrich themselves through advertising and 
data-mining revenues.”

The statement noted that many works by Marx and Engels — including “The 
Communist Manifesto,” which urges, “Workers of the world, unite!” — were 
freely available in translation on the nonprofit archive and other sites.

Ms. Davison said, “This is a 50-volume, academic edition; it isn’t 
necessary to revolutionary activity,” and noted that much of the 
material included things like “Marx writing to Engels asking if you want 
to come by my house to go to this meeting.”

Because of how the complete works of Marx and Engels were translated 
into English, Ms. Davison said, the copyright had been shared among 
three publishers: Progress, a company in the Soviet Union that no longer 
exists; Lawrence & Wishart, once the official publisher of the British 
Communist Party; and the radical New York publishing house, 
International Publishers. Lawrence & Wishart, she said, has taken the 
lead in trying to form a digital strategy.

She said she expected a deal to take effect by early next year, and 
Lawrence & Wishart and International Publishers both said they would 
discuss how to divide the proceeds.

Even without the removed Marx and Engels material — consisting mainly of 
early philosophical and economic writings, as well as notes and letters 
in which their ideas were first hashed out — the Marxist Internet 
Archive still will host roughly 200,000 documents in more than 40 
languages from political theorists and economists.

Peter Linebaugh, a professor at the University of Toledo in Ohio, who 
has studied the history of communism, said that the comprehensive 
English translation of Marx’s and Engels’s writings was a galvanizing 
event, and that he had great respect for the effort that went into 
pulling it off. He expressed disappointment over the publisher’s move, 
and disputed the idea that you could divide Marx’s work into the 
important and the mundane. “What seems like arcane scholarship,” he 
said, “can appear as a bombshell to young militants.”

Surveying the entire affair, he concluded, “This is the triumph of 
capitalism, having the small fish biting at each other.”

Go to 
to see our boy David Walters.

More information about the Marxism mailing list