I assume you meant to write 'massager'? Not a bad epithet for Time. On Tue, May 13, 2014 10:03 am, Clay Claiborne wrote: > Of Course Not! We always blame the messager. > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Michael Smith <mjs at smithbowen.net> wrote: > >> Good lord, we're reading Time now?