[Marxism] What's up with this?
lnp3 at panix.com
Sat Oct 1 08:37:17 MDT 2016
On 10/1/16 10:19 AM, Mark Lause via Marxism wrote:
> On the other hand, there can be some confusion with just "Clinton,"
> especially if you are discussing a matter of record. That's because of
> Bill, of course. This is a problem with decadent dynastic politics.
I think one of the first signs of the SWP's departure from the planet
earth was its insistence that he should be referred to as William
Clinton and before him James Carter. They thought that using Bill or
Jimmy was crossing class lines.
More information about the Marxism