[Marxism] Vote for Clinton?

Clay Claiborne clayclai at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 17:44:13 MDT 2016


Remember a couple of weeks ago when you said:

Finally, isn't it time to recognize that the Trump campaign is toast? The
> numbers are devastating:

Well, now most polls  show Clinton's lead cut in half. Reuters has them
neck-in-neck. Any honest stock broker would be issuing a revised estimate
by now. Will you?

As I said, I think talk like that is treacherous and I don't say that light
because I have a great deal of respect for you, but I have to call them
like I see them.

It is only being put forward that Trump will surely lose to calm the fears
of voters who are convinced he is a much greater evil, so that they won't
worry so much and won't feel the need to vote for Clinton who they rightly

The question of whether he may win or not is something quite separate an
evaluation of his politics, which I want to get into with your Goldwater
quote but I see my lunch hr is drawing to a close so that will have tu wait.

So just on this question: I thought your estimate that the Trump campaign
was toast when you said it. I've laid out all the things that could happen
before 8 Nov. other places, there are many.

Are you now ready to revise your estimate of Trump's chances?

More, later


Clay Claiborne, Director
Vietnam: American Holocaust <http://VietnamAmericanHolocaust.com>
Linux Beach Productions
Venice, CA 90291
(310) 581-1536

Read my blogs at the Linux Beach <http://claysbeach.blogspot.com/>

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Louis Proyect via Marxism <
marxism at lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

> ********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *****************************************************************
> On 9/1/16 4:46 PM, A.R. G via Marxism wrote:
>> As for what we should have supported, there were multiple, functioning
>> mass
>> movements in the country in 1964, and you'll note that most of them did
>> not
>> play electoral politics at all.
> Not exactly. SDS had become fairly massive by that point and raised the
> slogan "Part of the Way with LBJ". The CPUSA, which was still the largest
> "Leninist" group on the left, would have upped the ante and called for "All
> the Way with LBJ". In fact the dynamics of the 1964 election were JUST like
> those today. Voting for anybody but LBJ was considered the same thing as
> voting for Goldwater who everybody thought was ready to blow up the world
> with hydrogen bombs. He said "I would remind you that extremism in the
> defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation
> in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" That was widely interpreted as a
> threat to impose a fascist dictatorship on the USA.
> _________________________________________________________
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/opt
> ions/marxism/clayclai%40gmail.com

More information about the Marxism mailing list