[Marxism] Fwd: Trump’s Fledgling Presidency Has Already Collapsed

Jeff meisner at xs4all.nl
Tue Aug 8 10:35:39 MDT 2017

On 2017-08-08 15:52, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:
> this article is a
> useful reminder of how unlikely it ever was for Trump to be a new
> Hitler or Mussolini.

Oh now isn't that about the only reason you ever send us an article 
about Trump? One after another, only to make the same point but always 
in the simplistic and binary form such as "Trump to be a new Hitler or 
Mussolini" without any nuance regarding the possible forms and 
trajectories of what we might term "fascism" or far-right populism. And 
wouldn't it be better to argue against ideas that have actually been 
expressed (such as by many of us who see qualitative and crucial 
differences between Trump and what had been tolerated even among the 
right wing of the US Republican and other mainstream bourgeois parties) 
rather than creating strawmen claiming "new Hitler or Mussolini" (words 
that I'm quite sure I never used)? I see Lou's repeated attempts to win 
a non-existent argument in this fashion whenever he spots certain things 
in print which I suspect he often doesn't read through himself (in at 
least one case he would have found the article's conclusions quite at 
variance to the one-liner he attached to it). Each time I have to 
suppress my urge to respond, because in fact there isn't anything in the 
article itself I need to address, just the way Louis is employing it.

Likewise this article (which I read through as a matter of courtesy) 
only goes over matters that are already more or less familiar (though 
you might still find it worth reading), and indeed does show, not that 
Trump himself isn't or couldn't be a fascist, but that the US state has 
not become a fascist dictatorship and isn't heading in that direction. 
But then it even goes on to present a caveat (did Louis read this far 
into it?):

"...here is one frightening exception. Trump could regain public 
standing through the rally-round-the-flag effect that usually occurs 
following a domestic attack or at the outset of a war."

Let's see: an authoritarian figure gaining increased or dictatorial 
powers after rallying his nation to war. Do possibilities of that sort 
not concern readers of this list? Or a campaign against refugees leading 
to widespread human rights abuse if not further to actual genocide. Is 
there no historical precedent for such concerns?

I wasn't sure before the US election, but now I will say that Trump 
surely isn't a fascist: he's shown himself to be too stupid politically 
to justify an ideological label. But he surrounds himself with fascists 
(not exclusively) and certainly isn't anti-fascist. The bigger question 
is whether the state will become fascist, and not even looking into the 
future asking whether the voters who won the election for him were 
voting for fascism (thus indicating their future compliance or 
complicity with a state possessing such characteristics). I'd 
geusstimate that half of the 2016 Trump voters were in fact 
"deplorables" of that sort; the other half were just ignorant of the 
dangers they may have opened the doors to.

It's inaccurate to argue that yes Trump got elected and no we don't have 
fascism in the US now. That's like if I tell you it's dangerous to cross 
the highway blindfolded, you do it anyway, and then point out that 
nothing bad happened so I was wrong. No, I wasn't wrong: I was right and 
you were lucky! And most times you would be that lucky in that 
situation, but the stakes are too high to ignore the danger you put 
yourself in. The dangers entailed by Trump, in addition to the above 
mentioned scenario of militarism -> war -> fascism, have especially to 
do with the far-right or fascist component of his base. That includes 
the ones he invited into government posts (or his personal staff) which 
is already associated with negative executive policies and legislation, 
predictably. But moreover I'm thinking of those millions of deplorables, 
bigots and small business types, who have stated in polls that they 
would defend Trump in street battles. Does that not sound a bit more 
like "fascism", more like "a new Hitler or Mussolini," than what 
currently manifests as disarray and confusion within the government?

My main point is that there was never any exaggeration of the dangers of 
Trump being elected after promoting typical fascist motifs and 
mobilizing support among groups that are reminiscent of those that 
propelled Hitler and Mussolini to power. More than many countries, the 
US state is carefully stabilized through a separation of powers between 
the three branches (plus civilian control of the military). This is an 
essential protection against volatility, especially against the worry of 
a mass election victory for the far-left. But it also works to prevent a 
take-over by the far right (when unwelcome by most of the ruling class). 
To wit, Trump's original Muslim ban was overturned by 
previously-appointed judges, eventually resulting in a compromise ban 
(itself an awful precedent!), still facing court action. So no, the US 
did not become fascist just from an election result (no one ever thought 
that anyway), nor is fascism a likely outcome from the current turmoil 
and balance of forces. But that is a lot different from saying that this 
was like any other election between Democrats and Republicans, that the 
outcome wouldn't predict any essential difference in subsequent 
outcomes. Let alone the opinion of some leftists I have heard (including 
at least one on this list) that his victory was no worse, or even 
preferable, to a victory for the mainstream Clinton who would have (for 
instance...) started a war with Russia.

Trump's victory was a tragedy that should have been prevented especially 
by those who should have known better but were blinded by formulaic 
thinking and swayed by disinformation from Russia (or "probably from 

- Jeff

> http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/08/trumps-fledgling-presidency-has-already-collapsed.html

More information about the Marxism mailing list