[Marxism] She’s a ‘Star’ Latina Professor. But Not Good Enough for Tenure at Harvard.

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Dec 4 06:43:31 MST 2019


Chronicle of Higher Education, DECEMBER 03, 2019  PREMIUM
She’s a ‘Star’ Latina Professor. But Not Good Enough for Tenure at Harvard.
By Jack Stripling

Harvard University’s decision to deny tenure to a highly regarded 
Latina/o-studies professor sparked outrage this week among scholars and 
students, and has thrust the university into a broader national 
discussion about whether faculty of color are held to unfair standards 
in promotion decisions. It has also invited skepticism about whether the 
old guard of the Ivy League undervalues emerging scholarship on matters 
of race and ethnicity.

Lorgia García Peña, an associate professor of romance languages and 
literatures, was officially informed by phone on Friday that she would 
not be granted tenure at Harvard, according to one of her mentors, who 
spoke to The Chronicle. News of the decision astonished scholars in her 
discipline, who took to Twitter with slack-jawed reactions that a woman 
whom they describe as a prominent contributor to her field apparently 
wasn’t good enough for Harvard.


Rosemary G. Feal
@rgfeal
Tenure denials like the injustice we’ve just seen at Harvard often have 
the effect of communicating that the FIELD is perceived as illegitimate. 
Lorgia García-Peña is at the top of a field she has helped invent. 
Harvard invested in that by hiring her.

697
11:48 PM - Dec 2, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
163 people are talking about this
“She is perhaps the leading scholar in Dominican studies of this 
generation. Period,” said Carlos U. Decena, chairman of Latino and 
Caribbean studies at Rutgers University. “Her work is ambitious, it’s 
intellectually audacious, politically on point. This is what Harvard 
wants. This is what would be desirable to any elite institution of that 
caliber.”

Part of the reaction from scholars, Decena continued, “is sheer outrage, 
and part of it is bafflement.”

García Peña, who did not respond to an interview request, is the author 
of The Borders of Dominicanidad: Race, Nations and Archives of 
Contradictions (Duke University Press, 2016). Her biography also lists a 
forthcoming book, which Decena described as “field changing.” (Laura 
Sell, a spokeswoman for Duke press, said in an email on Tuesday that the 
book is “under contract based on peer review.”)

The tenure decision struck a particular nerve at Harvard, where students 
have for decades advocated for the formation of an ethnic-studies 
department. But it has broader resonance across higher education, where 
the diversity commitments of some of the nation’s wealthiest 
institutions have of late been called into question. This past spring, 
13 professors at Yale University threatened to quit en masse if the 
university did not do more to support its ethnicity, race, and migration 
program. The professors eventually agreed to stay, but only after Yale 
allocated five faculty positions to the program.

In response to the tenure denial at Harvard, about 50 students staged a 
sit-in on Monday evening in University Hall, The Harvard Crimson, the 
student newspaper, reported. By Tuesday evening, more than 2,700 
concerned students and scholars had signed an open letter to Lawrence S. 
Bacow, Harvard’s president, and Alan M. Garber, the provost.

The letter demands that Harvard release documents related to García 
Peña’s case and calls for an investigation to identify evidence of 
“procedural errors, prejudice, and discrimination.” It also demands that 
Harvard create an ethnic-studies department.

Harvard has so far stopped short of creating such a department. In June, 
however, the university publicly committed to hiring a cluster of 
faculty in the area of ethnicity, indigeneity, and migration. Claudine 
Gay, dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, said at the time that the 
disciplines provide a “valuable lens for understanding contemporary 
American society.”

(Gay, who was not made available for an interview on Tuesday, is a 
professor of government and of African and African American studies). 
The Chronicle e-mailed more than a half-dozen professors in García 
Peña’s department, including the chairman, and none responded.

García Peña’s tenure denial sets up a potentially awkward scenario in 
the cluster hiring effort because she is among the committee members 
vetting candidates for these positions, several people close to her said.

“To think she is leading this effort to recruit the people who will 
replace her,” said Decena, the Rutgers professor. “Wow. That’s perverse.”

The letter from students and scholars asked how these searches could be 
successful, “when an eminently qualified committee member has been 
denied tenure?”

Mysterious Process

García Peña came to Harvard, in 2010, as an assistant professor, 
according to her curriculum vitae. She was promoted, in 2017, to 
associate professor, which is an untenured rank in Harvard’s Arts and 
Sciences school. (Harvard has an unusually long tenure approval process).

Candidates for tenure at Harvard are voted on at the departmental level, 
and reviewed by a school-level committee and the dean, before the 
president makes a final decision. The president may decide to grant 
tenureor request an additional ad hoc review, in which “witnesses” from 
the department and external reviewers are called upon for input.

Judith D. Singer, senior vice provost for faculty diversity and 
development, once described the ad hoc process as “greatly shrouded in 
mystery.” It is designed, Singer told The Crimson, to “look at the 
totality of the evidence and make a dispassionate decision about whether 
the recommendations that have come up are really in the best interest of 
the university.”

Harvard officials would not comment on García Peña’s case, declining to 
answer questions about where in the process she was denied tenure. But 
the case has invited criticism of Harvard’s ad-hoc-committee process, 
which some professors see as particularly opaque and ripe for bad 
decision-making.

“In this process, there is a lot of possibility for intervention from 
people who are not experts in someone’s field, and that committee is 
secret,” said Yolanda Martinez-San Miguel, the mentor who confirmed to 
The Chronicle that García Peña’s tenure had been denied.

Martinez-San Miguel, chairwoman of Latin American studies at the 
University of Miami, said the case has resonated with ethnic-studies 
professors because it highlights “a structural problem” for people who 
do not neatly fit into a single discipline.

“Too many of the scholars in these emerging fields end up with joint 
appointments,” said Martinez-San Miguel, who was a member of García 
Peña’s dissertation committee. “They end up having to work more. In 
order for me to do what I wanted to do, I had to be in two departments. 
And that was more work, more committees, more meetings.”



Yarimar Bonilla, a political anthropologist at City University of New 
York's Hunter College, reacted viscerally when she heard about García 
Peña’s case. In a Twitter thread, she described a career of seeing women 
of color disproportionately passed over or forced to appeal tenure 
decisions, a practice she described as “violence rooted in plantation 
logic.”


Yarimar Bonilla 👩🏾‍💻
@yarimarbonilla
Let’s be clear: the denial of tenure to minoritized faculty is a form of 
violence. Most are reversed and/or the candidate moves to a diff 
institution/life but the scars remain—among peers+ students also. It’s 
spectacular violence rooted in plantation logic 
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScxDSWy2NLjAdH-IvuQrz9j-iWTwDHU6Zhs0HcxQ1HErIzrAA/viewform 
…


On Professor Lorgia García-Peña’s Tenure Denial and the Future of Ethnic 
Studies at Harvard
Dear President Larry Bacow and Provost Alan Garber, We are a coalition 
of graduate students and concerned scholars writing in response to the 
news that Harvard University has denied tenure to...

docs.google.com
381
8:29 PM - Dec 2, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
155 people are talking about this
García Peña “is a star and will continue to do incredible work,” Bonilla 
said in an interview. “This says more about Harvard than it does about 
her. How can anyone believe they are committed to ethnic studies, when 
they can’t tenure a star in the field?”



More information about the Marxism mailing list