[Marxism] The Crisis Lurking in Californians’ Taps: How 1,000 Water Systems May Be at Risk

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Thu Jul 25 07:33:50 MDT 2019

NY Times, July 25, 2019
The Crisis Lurking in Californians’ Taps: How 1,000 Water Systems May Be 
at Risk
By Jose A. Del Real

COMPTON, Calif. — It was bath time and Rosalba Moralez heard a cry. She 
rushed to the bathroom and found her 7-year-old daughter, Alexxa, being 
doused with brown, putrid water.

“We kept running the tub, we turned on the sink, we flushed the toilet. 
All the water was coming out dirty,” Ms. Moralez said.

For more than a year, discolored water has regularly gushed from faucets 
in the family’s bathroom and kitchen, as in hundreds of other households 
here in Willowbrook, Calif., an unincorporated community near Compton in 
South Los Angeles.

The brown water, provided by the Sativa Los Angeles County Water 
District, first drew public outrage and local news media attention last 
year when customers began protesting over unexplained stomach pains and 
skin so itchy it had scarred from the scratching.

Elected officials were soon jolted into action. Sativa’s elected board 
of directors was disbanded and Los Angeles County took control of the 
water district. The county is now working furiously to replace 
dilapidated pipes and wells, and this week began new construction to 
reinforce Sativa’s system. But problems persist. Overhauling the 
district has taken far more time and money than anyone initially 
expected because, by the time the county stepped in last fall, the 
district’s infrastructure was on the brink of collapse.

Sativa is just one case, which erupted into public view after decades of 
neglect. The rot in California’s water system likely extends far beyond it.

As many as 1,000 community water systems in California may be at high 
risk of failing to deliver potable water — one out of every three — 
according to a previously undisclosed estimate by senior officials at 
the California State Water Resources Control Board, which regulates 
drinking water. These troubled districts, which include Sativa, often 
operate in mostly poor areas on thin budgets. With little oversight, 
they face problems ranging from bankruptcy to sudden interruptions in 
water capacity, to harmful toxins being delivered through taps.

[Sign up for our daily newsletter about news from California here.]

Nationally, political leaders have struggled to reach consensus over how 
to rebuild America’s aging infrastructure, including the country’s 
drinking water systems, which the American Society of Civil Engineers 
gave a D rating in its 2017 report. In California, the abundance of 
small water districts, a fraught culture around water rights, and 
significant oversight gaps have exacerbated those problems.

California has one of the most byzantine drinking water systems in the 
country, and even in urban parts of the state some water systems are so 
small they struggle to sustain their maintenance budgets. The hodgepodge 
of small districts are overseen by local boards — often with little to 
no expertise in water management — making it difficult for the state to 
keep track of them.

Already, more than 300 public water systems in the state are out of 
compliance with federal drinking water safety standards, according to 
publicly available data, and an estimated one million Californians are 
exposed to unsafe drinking water each year. Those are the ones the state 
knows about because their water quality has already been tested as unsafe.

[The soil in California’s farm country is fertile, but the water is bad. 
Read more about the failing water systems in the San Joaquin Valley.]

Often, the state water board does not collect enough information from 
public water systems to catch mismanagement until the systems are 
already failing, or are approaching that threshold like Sativa, 
according to interviews with several officials. The state agency does 
not keep a list of suspected high-risk systems. The limited information 
that is collected from water districts is often scattered across 
agencies and levels of government, including county boundary 
commissions, which may be either reluctant to become involved or lack 
the authority to do so.

“We didn’t know how bad the problems were,” said Russ Bryden, an 
engineer with the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, who 
took over day-to-day management of Sativa as an emergency administrator 
last fall. “You could not have known from the outside. Sativa was not 
supposed to be this bad.”

When Los Angeles County took control, officials discovered that the 
problems at Sativa ran even deeper than anyone knew. They found the 
system needed more than $10 million in urgent repairs to protect against 
it shutting down entirely, according to Mr. Bryden. They uncovered 
hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid bills and debts. And a rash 
of suspicious spending in 2017 had left the district with just $10,000, 
according to balances reviewed by The New York Times.

County officials have attributed the discoloration of the water to high 
levels of manganese from old pipes, but county and state health 
officials say the water in the Sativa district is safe to drink; the 
brown color is classified as a secondary, aesthetic violation, according 
to federal standards.

But no one wants to drink brown water, and residents have lost faith in 
the district’s promises that the water is safe to use. To them, the 
problems at Sativa are just another example of the growing inequality 
they see across California.

The seamstresses, chauffeurs and domestic workers who live in 
Willowbrook, a community in the district that is primarily Hispanic and 
where 70 percent of residents speak Spanish at home, maintain neat 
front-yard patios where bright purple and yellow flowers bloom. But 
their roads are lined with potholes, vacant businesses are a common 
sight and many street signs are so faded they are difficult to read.

Although one in four residents here live in poverty, those who do not 
want to drink from their taps — which they no longer trust, even when 
the water is not brown — spend more money on drinking water than many 
families do in Beverly Hills, 20 miles away. Ms. Moralez, a home health 
aide, estimates her family spends about $150 a month on bottled water in 
addition to the family’s $67 monthly payment to the water district, 
which it still must pay. The family currently lives on a single income.

Anticipating another surge of brown water caused by the new construction 
this week, the county stockpiled huge amounts of bottled water to hand 
out to residents.

The distrust among residents was decades in the making, but there were 
few legal pathways for government intervention.

The district was issued various citations over the years, which were 
later enumerated in the state water board’s own October 2018 order 
taking control of the district, including for repeatedly failing to 
adequately test water quality.

Staff at the county commission that reviews municipal services began to 
raise alarms about Sativa’s management practices as early as 2005. By 
2012, after another service review, the commission discovered that 
Sativa had not carried out any financial audits in seven years, and it 
began to push for the district to consolidate with another water 
utility, said Paul Novak, the executive officer at the Los Angeles Local 
Agency Formation Commission.

“They had no water meters, they had no computer systems, there were some 
extreme nepotism issues, and they were giving illegal holiday bonuses,” 
Mr. Novak said. “We don’t go into an agency and say, ‘You need to be 
dissolved or consolidated.’ But when you’re dealing with people who are, 
at best, incompetent, the rules have to change.”

Despite signs of mismanagement, the agency’s commissioners feared 
becoming mired in a costly battle to dissolve the district.

In November 2015, E. coli was detected in one of Sativa’s three wells 
and it was shut down after a state recommendation, leaving Sativa with 
just two wells, barely enough to meet its water capacity needs.

All along, the district’s leadership suffered from infighting and poor 
financial decision-making, said Elizabeth Hicks, who served on Sativa’s 
board of directors between 2003 and 2015. She described a toxic culture 
on the board.

“It was in shambles,” she said.

When the county took over day-to-day management of Sativa in November, 
Mr. Bryden, the emergency administrator, said he could not find any 
financial bookkeeping, including invoices, purchase orders or receipts. 
The county is conducting a broader audit of the district’s finances, 
which will be released later this summer.

The financial situation appears to have only worsened in recent years. 
In June 2015, Sativa had nearly $600,000 in an investment fund it used 
as a savings account; by late 2018, there was just $10,000 left, yet the 
district had amassed hundreds of thousands of dollars of unpaid bills 
and debts. A loan from City National Bank for $1.6 million was taken out 
during that time to build a new well, but today nearly $1 million 
remains unaccounted for.

Luis Landeros, the Sativa board president between 2016 and 2018, 
declined to comment. None of the other board members who served during 
that time responded to multiple requests for comment. Sativa’s former 
general manager, Thomas Martin, told The Los Angeles Times in September 
that he did not support the state’s ultimate decision to take over the 
troubled water district: “I was hoping it would be a different outcome,” 
he said. “We disagree with the legislators’ decision. We wish the best 
of luck to the customers.”

As the district fell into deeper financial despair over the last few 
years, Julia Hernandez and her family in Willowbrook became fearful of 
showering in the water because of intense itching they felt afterward. 
Ms. Hernandez said that last summer she gave her 4-year-old grandson a 
bath and he broke out in hives, bad enough that she had to take him to 
the doctor.

On a recent day, she pointed to pockmarks on her own skin, leftover 
scars from scratching.

The inside of her bathtub is sometimes coated with wet silt, she said. 
Her washing machine sometimes gets clogged and last year she had to 
replace her boiler, which cost her family $700.

“You put your white clothes in the washer and they come out brown,” she 

In Sacramento, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a budget plan in June which 
includes $130 million annually to help distressed water systems in the 
state. The money will help small districts fund desperately needed repairs.

But it is unclear, however, how much that would help improve the 
oversight of troubled districts before they become dysfunctional and 
even more costly to repair.

For now, Los Angeles County has borne the brunt of the financial costs 
involved with rehabilitating Sativa. Of the estimated $14 million in 
repairs necessary, the county will likely pay for about $8 million. The 
rest will be covered by continued revenue — clients must still pay their 
bill despite the brown water — and state grants. The county is currently 
looking for a water utility to take Sativa over permanently, most likely 
a privately owned water company.

Many people in the Sativa district, even now, are skeptical that things 
will improve.

“People think this is the ghetto, so they don’t care,” Ms. Moralez said.

More information about the Marxism mailing list