[Marxism] Who Really Killed Malcolm X?

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Sun Feb 9 09:39:52 MST 2020

NY Times, Feb. 9, 2020
Who Really Killed Malcolm X?
By John Leland

For more than half a century, scholars have maintained that prosecutors 
convicted the wrong men in the assassination of Malcolm X.

Now, 55 years after that bloody afternoon in February 1965, the 
Manhattan district attorney’s office is reviewing whether to 
reinvestigate the murder.

Some new evidence comes from a six-part documentary called “Who Killed 
Malcolm X?,” streaming on Netflix Feb. 7, which posits that two of the 
men convicted could not have been at the scene that day.

Instead it points the finger at four members of a Nation of Islam mosque 
in Newark, N.J., depicting their involvement as an open secret in their 
city. One even appeared in a 2010 campaign ad for then-Newark mayor Cory 

“What got us hooked,” said Rachel Dretzin, a director of the documentary 
along with Phil Bertelsen, “was the notion that the likely shotgun 
assassin of Malcolm X was living in plain sight in Newark, and that many 
people knew of his involvement, and he was uninvestigated, unprosecuted, 

The case has long tempted scholars, who see a conspiracy hidden in 
unreleased government documents. A detective on the case, Anthony V. 
Bouza, wrote flatly a few years ago, “The investigation was botched.”

Yet it has never sparked the widespread obsessive interest of the 
Kennedy assassination or the equally brazen killing of Tupac Shakur. 
Attempts to reopen the case — to uncover the possible roles of the 
F.B.I., New York Police Department and the Nation of Islam leadership, 
including Louis Farrakhan — have gotten nowhere.

“The vast majority of white opinion at that time was that this was 
black-on-black crime, and maybe black-extremist-on-black-extremist 
crime,” said David Garrow, a Pulitzer Prize-winning civil rights 
historian. “And there was for decades a consensus in black communities 
that we are not going to pick up that rock to see what’s underneath it.”

At the time Malcolm spoke at the Audubon Ballroom on Feb. 21, 1965, he 
was a marked man — spied on by the F.B.I. and the police, denounced as a 
traitor by the Nation leadership, viscerally hated and beloved. Mr. 
Farrakhan declared him “worthy of death.” A week before his 
assassination, his home in Queens was firebombed while he and his wife 
and four daughters slept inside.

Talmadge Hayer, a member of the Nation of Islam from a New Jersey 
mosque, was arrested fleeing the ballroom, with a clip from a handgun 
used in the killing. Later the police arrested two men from Malcolm’s 
former Harlem mosque, Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X Johnson, both 
known as enforcers.

At trial, Mr. Hayer, who later became Mujahid Abdul Halim, admitted his 
guilt but said the other two men were innocent. All three men were 
convicted and received life sentences. Mr. Johnson, who became Khalil 
Islam, died in 2009; Mr. Butler, who is now Muhammad Abdul Aziz, was 
granted parole in 1985 and still maintains his innocence.

In the late 1970s, Mr. Halim filed affidavits naming four members of the 
Newark mosque as his partners in the crime. The civil rights lawyer 
William Kunstler moved to reopen the case but was denied.

Since then, the legwork has fallen to biographers and independent 
researchers, including a Washington, D.C., tour guide named Abdur-Rahman 
Muhammad, the central figure in the new documentary series.

“It bothered me that no one cared about it,” Mr. Muhammad said. “I 
didn’t get paid to do any of this. I’ve sold cars. I’m just a 
working-class guy.”

Mr. Muhammad in 2010 uncovered the identity of one of the supposed 
assassins named in Mr. Hayer’s affidavit, William Bradley, who had 
changed his name to Almustafa Shabazz and was married to a prominent 
Newark activist. It was Mr. Bradley’s shotgun blast, researchers 
contend, that killed Malcolm.

Mr. Shabazz, who died in 2018, denied any involvement in the murder, and 
lived in plain sight. “I knew him well,” Cory Booker says in the 
documentary, adding that he was not aware of Mr. Shabazz’s past identity.

Mr. Muhammad published Mr. Shabazz’s name and photograph on his blog in 
2010, and then shared his research with Manning Marable, who was working 
on his Pulitzer Prize-winning biography, “Malcolm X: A Life of 
Reinvention.” Mr. Muhammad believes that the other three men named in 
Mr. Hayer’s affidavits are dead.

After the book came out, Alvin Sykes, a Kansas City activist who helped 
persuade the F.B.I. and Justice Department to create a cold case unit 
for civil rights-era killings, lobbied federal prosecutors to 
reinvestigate Malcolm’s murder. The department declined. When Mr. 
Shabazz died, the last remaining loose end was Mr. Aziz, the former 
Norman 3X Butler, now 81, who served 20 years for a crime he insists he 
did not commit.

Lawyers for Mr. Aziz now hope the Manhattan district attorney will clear 
his name. A spokesman for Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the D.A., said in a 
statement that the preliminary review “will inform the office regarding 
what further investigative steps may be undertaken.” One of the 
prosecutors conducting the review, Peter Casolaro, played a vital role 
in throwing out the convictions of the five men wrongfully imprisoned 
for raping a jogger in Central Park in 1989.

Mr. Aziz, who declined an interview request, has said he could not have 
been at the Audubon that day because security would have blocked his 
entry, and that anyway, he was nearly immobile from a police beating a 
short while before. In the documentary he expresses little hope for the 
process. “I just don’t believe in these people,” he says. “I got 20 
years of my life to show that I shouldn’t believe in them.”

Not all are convinced. Karl Evanzz, author of “The Judas Factor: The 
Plot to Kill Malcolm X,” cited film footage that he said shows Mr. Aziz 
at the Audubon, and dismissed Mr. Muhammad’s research as unreliable.

David Shanies, who with the Innocence Project is representing Mr. Aziz, 
said only that the lawyers looked forward to working cooperatively with 
prosecutors “to see that justice is done.” Their case includes F.B.I. 
documents that were never shared with local police or prosecutors. Barry 
Scheck of the Innocence Project said that based on this evidence, “We 
are troubled that the conviction was not vacated in 1978,” when Mr. 
Hayer filed his affidavits.

If the district attorney stands by the conviction, the lawyers can move 
to argue it in State Supreme Court.

But even if Mr. Aziz prevails, it will not settle questions about the 
larger forces that many think contributed to Malcolm’s death — the law 
enforcement agencies that spied on him but failed to protect him, the 
Nation leaders who called tacitly for his head. That part of the story, 
along with volumes of unreleased F.B.I. files, may never fully surface.

“When you’re dealing with a complex crime, and you simplify it to five 
members of the Nation of Islam walking into a ballroom, you don’t give 
people the context they need,” said Zak Kondo, author of “Conspiracys: 
Unravelling the Assassination of Malcolm X.”

“A whole generation went to their graves knowing important information 
that people like me will never know,” he said. “That’s the most 
frustrating part.”

More information about the Marxism mailing list